Use of a preference-based measure of health (EQ-5D) in COPD and asthma

被引:109
|
作者
Pickard, A. Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wilke, Caitlyn [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Eunmi [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Sneh [1 ,2 ]
Stavem, Knut [4 ]
Lee, Todd A. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Ctr Pharmacoecon Res, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Adm, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Ctr Management Complex Chron Dis, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[4] Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Med, NO-1478 Lorenskog, Norway
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
asthma; COPD; health outcomes; quality of life; EQ-5D;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: EQ-5D is a generic preference-based measure of health that can help to understand the impact of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this paper was to synthesize literature on the validity and reliability of EQ-5D use in studies of asthma and COPD, and estimate EQ-5D utility scores associated with stage of disease. Methods: A structured search was conducted in EMBASE and MEDLINE (1988-2007) using keywords relevant to respiratory disease and EQ-5D. Original research studies in asthma or COPD that reported EQ-5D results and/or psychometric properties were included. Results: Studies that reported psychometric properties supported the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of EQ-5D in asthma (seven studies) and COPD (nine studies), although some evidence of ceiling effects were observed in asthma studies. In asthma studies that reported summary scores (n = 11), EQ-5D index-based scores ranged from 0.42 (SD 0.30) to 0.93 (SD not reported). In COPD studies (n = 8), scores ranged from 0.52 (SD 0.16) to 0.84 (SD 0.15). While few asthma studies reported scores by severity level, sufficient studies in COPD were available to calculate pooled mean utility scores according to GOLD stage: stage I = 0.74 (0.62-0.87), stage II = 0.74 (0.66-0.83), stage III = 0.69 (0.60-0.78) and stage IV = 0.61 (0.44-0.77) (most severe).
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 536
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of the EQ-5D preference-based health status measure in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Janssen, M. F.
    Lubetkin, E. I.
    Sekhobo, J. P.
    Pickard, A. S.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (04) : 395 - 413
  • [2] DEVELOPMENT OF A PREFERENCE-BASED INSTRUMENT: COMPARED WITH EQ-5D
    Park, J.
    Ahn, J.
    Jo, M.
    Shin, S.
    Suh, J.
    Cho, S.
    Ock, M.
    Lee, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A713 - A713
  • [3] Preference-based Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life: the EQ-5D Questionnaire
    Moock, J.
    [J]. PHYSIKALISCHE MEDIZIN REHABILITATIONSMEDIZIN KURORTMEDIZIN, 2008, 18 (05) : 245 - 249
  • [4] Methodological issues with the analysis of preference-based EQ-5D index score
    Li, L.
    Fu, A. Z.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A181 - A181
  • [5] The EQ-5D as a measure of health outcomes
    Cabases, Juan M.
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2015, 29 (06) : 401 - 403
  • [6] Some methodological issues with the analysis of preference-based EQ-5D index score
    Li L.
    Fu A.Z.
    [J]. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2009, 9 (3) : 162 - 176
  • [7] Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States
    Sullivan, Patrick W.
    Ghushchyan, Vahram
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 26 (04) : 410 - 420
  • [8] Using generic preference-based measures in mental health: psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Mukuria, Clara
    Barkham, Michael
    Knapp, Martin
    Byford, Sarah
    Soeteman, Djora
    Brazier, John
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 205 (03) : 236 - 243
  • [9] Estimating Preference-Based EQ-5D Health State Utilities or Item Responses from Neuropathic Pain Scores
    Gu, Ning Yan
    Bell, Chris
    Botteman, Marc F.
    Ji, Xiang
    Carter, John A.
    van Hout, Ben
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (03): : 185 - 197
  • [10] Estimating Preference-Based EQ-5D Health State Utilities or Item Responses from Neuropathic Pain Scores
    Ning Yan Gu
    Chris Bell
    Marc F. Botteman
    Xiang Ji
    John A. Carter
    Ben van Hout
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2012, 5 (3) : 185 - 197