Predicting Hepatotoxicity Using ToxCast in Vitro Bioactivity and Chemical Structure

被引:98
|
作者
Liu, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mansouri, Kamel [1 ,3 ]
Judson, Richard S. [1 ]
Martin, Matthew T. [1 ]
Hong, Huixiao [4 ]
Chen, Minjun [4 ]
Xu, Xiaowei [2 ,4 ]
Thomas, Russell S. [1 ]
Shah, Imran [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Ctr Computat Toxicol, Off Res & Dev, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Informat Sci, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
[3] Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[4] US FDA, Div Bioinformat & Biostat, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
关键词
DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS; PROTEIN; 18; KDA; TRANSLOCATOR PROTEIN; ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; CLASSIFICATION; MODELS; HAZARD; DISEASE; RAT;
D O I
10.1021/tx500501h
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The U.S. Tox21 and EPA ToxCast program screen thousands of environmental chemicals for bioactivity using hundreds of high-throughput in vitro assays to build predictive models of toxicity. We represented chemicals based on bioactivity and chemical structure descriptors, then used supervised machine learning to predict in vivo hepatotoxic effects. A set of 677 chemicals was represented by 711 in vitro bioactivity descriptors (from ToxCast assays), 4,376 chemical structure descriptors (from QikProp, OpenBabel, PaDEL, and PubChem), and three hepatotoxicity categories (from animal studies). Hepatotoxicants were defined by rat liver histopathology observed after chronic chemical testing and grouped into hypertrophy (161), injury (101) and proliferative lesions (99). Classifiers were built using six machine learning algorithms: linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Naive Bayes (NB), support vector machines (SVM), classification and regression trees (CART), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and an ensemble of these classifiers (ENSMB). Classifiers of hepatotoxicity were built using chemical structure descriptors, ToxCast bioactivity descriptors, and hybrid descriptors. Predictive performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation testing and in-loop, filter-based, feature subset selection. Hybrid classifiers had the best balanced accuracy for predicting hypertrophy (0.84 +/- 0.08), injury (0.80 +/- 0.09), and proliferative lesions (0.80 +/- 0.10). Though chemical and bioactivity classifiers had a similar balanced accuracy, the former were more sensitive, and the latter were more specific. CART, ENSMB, and SVM classifiers performed the best, and nuclear receptor activation and mitochondrial functions were frequently found in highly predictive classifiers of hepatotoxicity. ToxCast and ToxRefDB provide the largest and richest publicly available data sets for mining linkages between the in vitro bioactivity of environmental chemicals and their adverse histopathological outcomes. Our findings demonstrate the utility of high-throughput assays for characterizing rodent hepatotoxicants, the benefit of using hybrid representations that integrate bioactivity and chemical structure, and the need for objective evaluation of classification performance.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 751
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Organ Toxicity Using &ITin Vitro&IT Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure
    Liu, Jie
    Patlewicz, Grace
    Williams, Antony J.
    Thomas, Russell S.
    Shah, Imran
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 30 (11) : 2046 - 2059
  • [2] Predicting bioactivity from chemical structure
    不详
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 1997, 47 (02) : 14 - 14
  • [3] Profiling Bioactivity of the ToxCast Chemical Library Using BioMAP Primary Human Cell Systems
    Houck, Keith A.
    Dix, David J.
    Judson, Richard S.
    Kavlock, Robert J.
    Yang, Jian
    Berg, Ellen L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING, 2009, 14 (09) : 1054 - 1066
  • [4] Predicting neurological targets for chemical neurotoxins using ToxCast in vitro data and read-across within QSAR Toolbox
    Chushak, Yaroslav
    Pangburn, Heather
    Gearhart, Jeffery M.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S281 - S281
  • [5] Understanding Conditional Associations between ToxCast in Vitro Readouts and the Hepatotoxicity of Compounds Using Rule-Based Methods
    Mahmoud, Samar Y.
    Svensson, Fredrik
    Zoufir, Azedine
    Modos, Derso
    Afzal, Avid M.
    Bender, Andreas
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 33 (01) : 137 - 153
  • [6] IN VITRO METHOD FOR PREDICTING CLINICAL HEPATOTOXICITY
    Kostrubsky, Seva
    DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2007, 39 : 7 - 8
  • [7] A comparison of machine learning approaches for predicting hepatotoxicity potential using chemical structure and targeted transcriptomic data
    Tate, Tia
    Patlewicz, Grace
    Shah, Imran
    COMPUTATIONAL TOXICOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [8] Leveraging in silico binding affinity, in vitro bioactivity, and chemical structure to develop machine learning models for predicting in vivo toxicity
    Kim, D.
    Ahn, S.
    Choi, J.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 399 : S59 - S59
  • [9] Characterizing cleft palate toxicants using ToxCast data, chemical structure, and the biomedical literature
    Baker, Nancy C.
    Sipes, Nisha S.
    Franzosa, Jill
    Belair, David G.
    Abbott, Barbara D.
    Judson, Richard S.
    Knudsen, Thomas B.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH, 2020, 112 (01): : 19 - 39
  • [10] Predictive Models for Human Organ Toxicity Based on In Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure
    Xu, Tuan
    Ngan, Deborah K.
    Ye, Lin
    Xia, Menghang
    Xie, Heidi Q.
    Zhao, Bin
    Simeonov, Anton
    Huang, Ruili
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 33 (03) : 731 - 741