Autonomous fault protection orbit domain Modeling in aerobraking

被引:0
|
作者
Kenworthy, John C. [1 ]
Seale, Eric H. [1 ]
Dates, Jason A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lockheed Martin Space Syst Co, POB 179 M-S S8003, Denver, CO 80201 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The SPacecraft Imbedded Distributed Error Response (SPIDER) Fault Protection architecture used on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) incrementally developed capabilities based upon heritage spacecraft. The primary driving factors behind the improvements for this mission stemmed from several key concerns and development goals/requirements. Due to decreased risk tolerance at the program level, most hardware was cross-strapped on the spacecraft and additional autonomous responses were required to ensure the safety of the spacecraft to provide for a more robust handling of the system during high-risk events. Numerous interplanetary spacecraft missions have demonstrated the need to reduce maintenance effort during spacecraft operations.(12) Aerobraking: the process of using atmospheric drag to dissipate orbital energy to achieve the desired science orbit following orbit insertion is a delicate process. The operations team is constrained by orbit geometry, 2-way light time delays, Martian weather, and a highly dynamic environment in which each pass through the atmosphere affects the subsequent orbit timing in a non-deterministic way. In the event of a fault on past missions, the operations team has required both constant contact with the spacecraft to diagnose the failure, and prompt issuance of the necessary ground commands to ensure spacecraft safety. In order to increase the autonomous response capability during Aerobraking and reduce the response time to faults, MRO developed a new set of capabilities, called the Navigation Performance Monitor (NPM). NPM, a member of the performance layer of SPIDER Fault Protection software, provides autonomous orbit domain modeling so the spacecraft may configure itself correctly for events within each orbit. During Aerobraking for MRO, NPM was called into action and successfully provided orbit modeling data to the Safe Mode software in response to two system faults; this demonstrated the robustness of our approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2565 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mars orbit insertion via ballistic capture and aerobraking
    Zong-Fu Luo
    Francesco Topputo
    Astrodynamics, 2021, 5 : 167 - 181
  • [22] AUTONOMOUS AEROBRAKING: THERMAL ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE SURFACE DEVELOPMENT
    Dec, John A.
    Thornblom, Mark N.
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2011, PTS I - IV, 2012, 142 : 483 - 497
  • [23] Autonomous Aerobraking Using Thermal Response Surface Analysis
    Prince, Jill L.
    Dec, John A.
    Tolson, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2009, 46 (02) : 292 - 298
  • [24] Autonomous aerobraking for low-cost interplanetary missions
    Carrelli, David
    O'Shaughnessy, Daniel
    Strikwerda, Thomas
    Kaidy, James
    Prince, Jill
    Powell, Richard
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2014, 93 : 467 - 474
  • [25] AUTONOMOUS AEROBRAKING DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE: PHASE 2 SUMMARY
    Cianciolo, Alicia D.
    Maddock, Robert W.
    Prince, Jill L.
    Bowes, Angela
    Powell, Richard W.
    White, Joseph P.
    Tolson, Robert
    O'Shaughnessy, Daniel
    Curelli, David
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2013, PTS I-III, 2014, 150 : 521 - 536
  • [26] A proposed use of accelerometer data for autonomous aerobraking at Mars
    Jah, M
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2001, PTS I-III, 2001, 109 : 1247 - 1256
  • [27] Modeling and Analysis of Plant Noise in Autonomous Orbit Determination Algorithm
    Shang, Lin
    Liu, Guohua
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Rui
    Li, Guotong
    CSNC 2011: 2ND CHINA SATELLITE NAVIGATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2011, : 462 - 466
  • [28] IMPLEMENTATION AND SIMULATION RESULTS USING AUTONOMOUS AEROBRAKING DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE
    Maddock, Robert W.
    Cianciolo, Alicia Dwyer
    Bowes, Angela
    Prince, Jill L. H.
    Powell, Richard W.
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2011, PTS I - IV, 2012, 142 : 499 - 512
  • [29] Autonomous safeing and fault protection for the new horizons mission to Pluto
    Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States
    1600, 7110-7118 (2006):
  • [30] Autonomous safeing and fault protection for the New Horizons mission to Pluto
    Moore, Robert C.
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2007, 61 (1-6) : 398 - 405