Characteristics of private abortion services in Mexico City after legalization

被引:22
|
作者
Schiavon, Raffaela [1 ]
Elena Collado, Maria [1 ]
Troncoso, Erika [1 ]
Soto Sanchez, Jose Ezequiel [2 ]
Otero Zorrilla, Gabriela [2 ]
Palermo, Tia [3 ]
机构
[1] Ipas Mexico, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Planeac & Anal Aplicado AC, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] CUNY, CUNY Inst Demog Res, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
abortion providers and services; privatisation; abortion methods; Mexico; HEALTH-POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/S0968-8080(10)36530-X
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In 2007, first trimester abortion was legalized in Mexico City, and the public sector rapidly expanded its abortion services. In 2008, to obtain information on the effect of the law on private sector abortion services, we interviewed 135 physicians working in private clinics, located through an exhaustive search. A large majority of the clinics offered a range of reproductive health services, including abortions. Over 70% still used dilatation and curettage (D & C); less than a third offered vacuum aspiration or medical abortion. The average number of abortions per facility was only three per month; few reported more than 10 abortions monthly. More than 90% said they had been offering abortion services for less than 20 months. Many women are still accessing abortion services privately, despite the availability of free or low-cost services at public facilities. However, the continuing use of D&C, high fees (mean of $157-505), poor pain management practices, unnecessary use of ultrasound, general anaesthesia and overnight stays, indicate that private sector abortion services are expensive and for from optimal. Now that abortions are legal, these results highlight the need for private abortion providers to be trained in recommended abortion methods and quality of private abortion core improved. (C)2010 Reproductive Health Matters. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abortion policy in San Juan. Experiences and challenges after legalization
    Edith Iturrieta, Yanina
    [J]. DERECHO Y CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2022, (26):
  • [22] BRITISH ABORTION PRACTICE IS APPRAISED 21 YEARS AFTER ITS LEGALIZATION
    RIND, P
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1989, 21 (05): : 236 - 237
  • [23] Telemedicine Abortion During the COVID Pandemic in Mexico City
    Carrera Riva-Palacio, A. G.
    Alvarez Tezpa, A. P.
    Carrera Hernandez, M. P.
    Oyamburu Viejo, S.
    Hernandez Zarco, G. A.
    Moreno Ramirez, H.
    Candelas, J. A.
    Lopez-Nava Vazquez, A.
    Perera, D.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 109 : 85 - 85
  • [24] General Production Services in Mexico City
    Garza, Gustavo
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DEMOGRAFICOS Y URBANOS, 2006, 21 (02): : 259 - 295
  • [25] Supreme Court upholds Mexico City abortion law
    不详
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2008, 16 (32) : 217 - 217
  • [26] Misoprostol knowledge and distribution in Mexico City after the change in abortion law: a survey of pharmacy staff
    Weaver, Greta
    Schiavon, Raffaela
    Elena Collado, Maria
    Kung, Stephanie
    Darney, Blair G.
    [J]. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 46 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [27] Qualitative Evidence on Abortion Stigma from Mexico City and Five States in Mexico
    Sorhaindo, Annik M.
    Juarez-Ramirez, Clara
    Diaz Olavarrieta, Claudia
    Aldaz, Evelyn
    Mejia Pineros, Maria Consuelo
    Garcia, Sandra
    [J]. WOMEN & HEALTH, 2014, 54 (07) : 622 - 640
  • [29] SECOND-TRIMESTER ABORTION IN PUBLIC HOSPITALS IN MEXICO CITY
    Saavedra-Avendano, B.
    Fuentes-Rivera, E.
    Darney, B. G.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (04) : 401 - 401
  • [30] Twelve years after abortion decriminalization in Mexico City: Can we still remain an island of liberties?
    Diaz Olavarrieta, Claudia
    Bonifaz Alfonzo, Leticia
    Sanhueza-Smith, Patricio
    Fajardo Dolci, German E.
    Guevara-Guzman, Rosalinda
    Beatriz Aburto-Arciniega, Monica
    Phillips, Vivian J.
    Arce Cedeno, Angelica
    Villa, Antonio R.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 62 : 63 - 78