Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy

被引:118
|
作者
Alran, Severine
De Rycke, Yann
Fourchotte, Virginie
Charitansky, Helene
Laki, Fatima
Falcou, Marie Christine
Benamor, Myriam
Frencaux, Paul
Salmon, Remy Jacques
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte
机构
[1] Inst Curie, Dept Surg Oncol, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Inst Curie, Dept Biostat, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] Inst Curie, Dept Med Imaging, F-75005 Paris, France
[4] Inst Curie, Dept Pathol, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; nomogram; micrometastasis; axillary metastases; prediction;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-006-9331-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is currently under discussion in the literature. The breast cancer nomogram (BCN), an online tool developed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), aims to predict the risk of positive non-SLN in SLN-positive patients. The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of the nomogram on patients with macrometastatic and micrometastatic SLN-positive biopsy findings. Methods: Patient characteristics, tumor pathology, and positive SLN characteristics were collected on 588 consecutive patients who underwent completion ALND. The MSKCC BCN tool was used to calculate risk of metastases for all 588 cases that included a subgroup of the 213 patients with SLN micrometastases. The BCN was performed for positive SLN biopsy findings regardless of the method of metastasis detection. Evaluation of the BCN was performed by the area under the curve method. Results: The BCN applied to all 588 patients achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of .724 (range, .677-.771) compared with .76 in the MSKCC study. When the tool was applied solely to micrometastases found by hematoxylin and eosin staining and metastases found by immunohistochemistry, the area under the ROC was .538 (range, .423-.653). Conclusions: The MSKCC nomogram has been validated for all the patients having a metastatic SLN at the Institut Curie. However, this model was not reliably predictive for positive non-SLN in cases with micrometastic positive SLN.
引用
收藏
页码:2195 / 2201
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Perhavec, Andraz
    Perme, Maja Pohar
    Hocevar, Marko
    Besic, Nikola
    Zgajnar, Janez
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 119 (02) : 357 - 366
  • [22] A nomogram to predict the likelihood of axillary non-sentinel lymph node metastases in sentinel lymph node positive primary breast cancer patients
    Hartkopf, A. D.
    Brucker, S. Y.
    Helms, G.
    Henze, M.
    Hahn, M.
    Wallwiener, M.
    Schoenfisch, B.
    Taran, F-A
    Fehm, T. N.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [23] Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Andraž Perhavec
    Maja Pohar Perme
    Marko Hočevar
    Nikola Besić
    Janez Žgajnar
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 119 : 357 - 366
  • [24] Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the non-sentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study
    Gur, A. S.
    Unal, B.
    Ozbek, U.
    Ozmen, V.
    Aydogan, F.
    Gokgoz, S.
    Gulluoglu, B. M.
    Aksaz, E.
    Ozbas, S.
    Baskan, S.
    Koyuncu, A.
    Soran, A.
    EJSO, 2010, 36 (01): : 30 - 35
  • [25] A nomogram predictive of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a sentinel lymph node micrometastasis
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    Nos, C.
    Giard, S.
    Mignotte, H.
    Esterni, B.
    Jacquemier, J.
    Buttarelli, M.
    Classe, J. -M.
    Cohen, M.
    Rouanet, P.
    Llorca, F. Penault
    Bonnier, P.
    Marchal, F.
    Garbay, J. -R.
    Fraisse, J.
    Martel, P.
    Fondrinier, E.
    de Lara, C. Tunon
    Rodier, J. -F.
    EJSO, 2009, 35 (07): : 690 - 695
  • [26] Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Reynders, Anneleen
    Brouckaert, Olivier
    Smeets, Ann
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Yoshihara, Emi
    Persyn, Frederik
    Floris, Giuseppe
    Leunen, Karin
    Amant, Frederic
    Soens, Julie
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Moerman, Philippe
    Vergote, Ignace
    Christiaens, Marie-Rose
    Staelens, Gracienne
    Van Eygen, Koen
    Vanneste, Alain
    Van Dam, Peter
    Colpaert, Cecile
    Neven, Patrick
    BREAST, 2014, 23 (04): : 453 - 459
  • [27] Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting additional nodal metastases after positive sentinel node biopsy
    Lambert, L
    Hunt, KK
    Hwang, RF
    Ross, MI
    Kuerer, H
    Singletary, SE
    Babiera, G
    Ames, FC
    Feig, B
    Meric-Bernstam, F
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (02) : S17 - S17
  • [28] Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Iranian Breast Cancer for Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastases
    Fattahi, Asieh
    Hoseini, Maryam
    HasanAbadi, Saeed Eslami
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S629 - S630
  • [29] Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel node metastases after minimal sentinel node involvement: Validation of the Helsinki breast nomogram
    Ouldamer, Lobna
    Arbion, Flavie
    Balagny, Alexis
    Fourquet, Florence
    Marret, Henri
    Body, Gilles
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (05): : 787 - 792
  • [30] Factors predicting the non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastases
    Boler, D. E.
    Uras, C.
    Ince, U.
    Cabioglu, N.
    BREAST, 2012, 21 (04): : 518 - 523