Beating heart myocardial revascularization on extracorporeal circulation in patients with endstage coronary artery disease

Objectives: To evaluate in a cohort of ESCAD patients (pts) the effects of on-pump/beating-heart versus conventional CABG in terms of early and mid-term survival and morbidity and LV function improvement. Methods: Between January 1993 and December 2000, 78 (Group I) ESCAD pts underwent on-pump/beating-heart surgery. Mean age in Group I was 66.2+/-6 (58-79), NYHA and CCS class were 3.2+/-0.6 and 3.3+/-0.4 respectively, Myocardial viability index 0.69+/-0.1 (%), LVEF (%) 24.8+/-4, LVEDP (mmHg) 28.1+/-5.8 and LVEDD(mm) 69.5+/-6. Group II consisted in 78 ESCAD patients undergoing conventional CABG selected in a randomized fashion from an age, sex, and LVEF corrected group of patients. Mean age in Group II was 65.7+/-5 (57-78), NYHA 3.1+/-0.7. CCS 3.4+/-0.8. LVEF(%) 25+/-5, LVEDP(mmHg) 27.9+/-4.4 and LVEDD(mm) 69.2+/-7.2. Results: Postoperatively, 5(7.7%) patients died in Group I versus 7(11.5%) patients in Group II (P >0.1). CPB time resulted to be in Group II patients (P = 0.001) and the mean distal anastomoses per patient was similar between groups (P = Ns). Perioperative AMI (P = 0.039). LCOS (P = 0.002), necessity for ultrafiltration (P = 0.018) and bleeding> 1000 ml (P = 0.029) were significantly higher in Group II. None of the Group I patients underwent surgical revision for bleeding versus 8(10.3%) patients in Group II (P = 0.011). At 6 months after surgery, the LV function improved significantly in Group I patients, demonstrated by an increased LVEF = 27.24(%)(P = 0.001), lower LVEDP = 26.4+/-3(mmHg)(P = 0.029) and LVEDD = 67+/-4 (mm) (P = 0.004) instead of a lower LVEDD = 66.8+/-6(mm) (P = 0.032) versus the preoperative data in Group [I. The actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 yr were 90, 82 and 71% in Group I and 89, 83 and 74% in Group II (P = Ns). Conclusion: In ESCAD patients who may poorly tolerate cardioplegic arrest, on-pump/beating-heart CABG may be an acceptable alternative associated with lower postoperative mortality and morbidity. Such a technique offers a better myocardial and renal protection associated with lower postoperative complications due to intraoperative hypoperfusion. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of The International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery.