Model and Parametric Uncertainty in Source-Based Kinematic Models of Earthquake Ground Motion

被引:18
|
作者
Hartzell, Stephen [1 ]
Frankel, Arthur [2 ]
Liu, Pengcheng [3 ]
Zeng, Yuehua [1 ]
Rahman, Sharifur [4 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Denver Fed Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[2] Univ Washington, US Geol Survey, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] US Bur Reclamat, Denver Fed Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[4] Chevron N Amer DWEP, Houston, TX 77054 USA
关键词
BAND SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAMS; STOCHASTIC FAULT MODEL; OMEGA-SQUARE MODEL; TIME HISTORIES; SPATIAL VARIATION; GREENS-FUNCTIONS; PREDICTION; RUPTURE; SIMULATION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1785/0120110028
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Four independent ground-motion simulation codes are used to model the strong ground motion for three earthquakes: 1994 M-w 6.7 Northridge, 1989 M-w 6.9 Loma Prieta, and 1999 M-w 7.5 Izmit. These 12 sets of synthetics are used to make estimates of the variability in ground-motion predictions. In addition, ground-motion predictions over a grid of sites are used to estimate parametric uncertainty for changes in rupture velocity. We find that the combined model uncertainty and random variability of the simulations is in the same range as the variability of regional empirical ground-motion data sets. The majority of the standard deviations lie between 0.5 and 0.7 natural-log units for response spectra and 0.5 and 0.8 for Fourier spectra. The estimate of model epistemic uncertainty, based on the different model predictions, lies between 0.2 and 0.4, which is about one-half of the estimates for the standard deviation of the combined model uncertainty and random variability. Parametric uncertainty, based on variation of just the average rupture velocity, is shown to be consistent in amplitude with previous estimates, showing percentage changes in ground motion from 50% to 300% when rupture velocity changes from 2.5 to 2: 9 km/s. In addition, there is some evidence that mean biases can be reduced by averaging ground-motion estimates from different methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2431 / 2452
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of the uncertainty in spatial-correlation models for earthquake ground motion due to station layout and derivation method
    Schiappapietra, Erika
    Douglas, John
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (13) : 5415 - 5438
  • [42] Assessment of the uncertainty in spatial-correlation models for earthquake ground motion due to station layout and derivation method
    Erika Schiappapietra
    John Douglas
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 5415 - 5438
  • [43] A trusted source-based model of mobile code security
    Liu, Wei-Wei
    Li, Xiao-Yong
    Han, Zhen
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 2154 - 2157
  • [44] Empirical Evaluation of Hierarchical Ground-Motion Models: Score Uncertainty and Model Weighting
    Mak, Sum
    Clements, Robert Alan
    Schorlemmer, Danijel
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 107 (02) : 949 - 965
  • [46] Evaluation of Ground-Motion Models for USGS Seismic Hazard Models Using Near-Source Instrumental Ground-Motion Recordings of the Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence
    McNamara, Daniel E.
    Wolin, Emily L. G.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    Powers, Peter M.
    Shumway, Alison M.
    Petersen, Mark D.
    Wilson, David C.
    Benz, Harley M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (04) : 1517 - 1529
  • [47] Kinematic Source Model of the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake Using Strong Motion Data
    Holden, Caroline
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 82 (06) : 783 - 788
  • [48] Influence of source uncertainty on stochastic ground motion simulation: a case study of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding, China, earthquake
    Dang, Pengfei
    Cui, Jie
    Liu, Qifang
    Li, Yadong
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (08) : 2943 - 2960
  • [49] Influence of source uncertainty on stochastic ground motion simulation: a case study of the 2022 Mw 6.6 Luding, China, earthquake
    Pengfei Dang
    Jie Cui
    Qifang Liu
    Yadong Li
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2023, 37 : 2943 - 2960
  • [50] Stochastic SH wave model of earthquake ground motion
    Harada, Takanori
    Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, 1994, 11 (02) : 1155 - 1225