Factors influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity and their implications on stream-aquifer interaction: a conceptual review

被引:36
|
作者
Naganna, Sujay Raghavendra [1 ]
Deka, Paresh Chandra [1 ]
Ch, Sudheer [2 ]
Hansen, William F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Karnataka, Dept Appl Mech & Hydraul, Mangalore 575025, India
[2] Minist Environm Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi, India
[3] Hansen Hydrol, Lexington, SC USA
关键词
Hydraulic conductivity; Streambed; Stream-aquifer interaction; Anthropogenic activities; Colmation; Fluvial hydrology; Hyporheic zone; SURFACE-WATER INTERACTIONS; RIVER ALLUVIAL-FAN; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; HYPORHEIC EXCHANGE; TROPICAL STREAM; SEDIMENT YIELD; RESIDENCE TIME; GROUNDWATER; FLOW; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-017-0393-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The estimation and modeling of streambed hydraulic conductivity (K) is an emerging interest due to its connection to water quality, aquatic habitat, and groundwater recharge. Existing research has found ways to sample and measure K at specific sites and with laboratory tests. The challenge undertaken was to review progress, relevance, complexity in understanding and modeling via statistical and geostatistical approaches, literature gaps, and suggestions toward future needs. This article provides an overview of factors and processes influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity (K) and its role in the stream-aquifer interaction. During our synthesis, we discuss the influence of geological, hydrological, biological, and anthropogenic factors that lead to variability of streambed substrates. Literature examples document findings to specific sites that help to portray the role of streambed K and other interrelated factors in the modeling of hyporheic and groundwater flow systems. However, studies utilizing an integrated, comprehensive database are limited, restricting the ability of broader application and understanding. Examples of in situ and laboratory methods of estimating hydraulic conductivity suggest challenges in acquiring representative samples and comparing results, considering the anisotropy and heterogeneity of fluvial bed materials and geohydrological conditions. Arriving at realistic statistical and spatial inference based on field and lab data collected is challenging, considering the possible sediment sources, processes, and complexity. Recognizing that the K for a given particle size group includes several to many orders of magnitude, modeling of streambed K and groundwater interaction remain conceptual and experimental. Advanced geostatistical techniques offer a wide range of univariate or multi-variate interpolation procedures such as kriging and variogram analysis that can be applied to these complex systems. Research available from various studies has been instrumental in developing sampling options, recognizing the significance of fluvial dynamics, the potential for filtration, transfer, and storage of high-quality groundwater, and importance to aquatic habitat and refuge during extreme conditions. Efforts in the characterization of natural and anthropogenic conditions, substrate materials, sediment loading, colmation, and other details highlight the great complexity and perhaps need for a database to compile relevant data. The effects on streambed hydraulic conductivity due to anthropogenic disturbances (in-stream gravel mining, contaminant release, benthic activity, etc.) are the areas that still need focus. An interdisciplinary (hydro-geo-biological) approach may be necessary to characterize the magnitude and variability of streambed K and fluxes at local, regional scales.
引用
收藏
页码:24765 / 24789
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selected factors influencing GCL hydraulic conductivity
    Petrov, RJ
    Rowe, RK
    Quigley, RM
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (08) : 683 - 695
  • [42] Spatial variability in streambed hydraulic conductivity of contrasting stream morphologies: channel bend and straight channel
    Sebok, E.
    Duque, C.
    Engesgaard, P.
    Boegh, E.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2015, 29 (03) : 458 - 472
  • [43] STREAM-AQUIFER INTERACTION OF A LARGE ALPINE RIVER WITH HEAT-TRACER METHODS AND HYDROLOGICAL MODELING
    Ravazzani, Giovanni
    Curti, Diego
    Mancini, Marco
    Rosso, Renzo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS: DELTAS OF THE FUTURE AND WHAT HAPPENS UPSTREAM, 2015, : 5836 - 5844
  • [44] Stream-aquifer interaction assessment using riparian evapotranspiration estimates from remote sensing algorithms
    Sritharan, Subramania I.
    Khanal, Pramila
    Wei, Xiaofang
    Kandiah, Ramanitharan
    Hatfield, Mark H.
    Neale, Christopher
    Osterberg, Johns
    REMOTE SENSING AND HYDROLOGY, 2012, 352 : 231 - +
  • [45] Effects of Baekje Weir Operation on the Stream-Aquifer Interaction in the Geum River Basin, South Korea
    Lee, Hyeonju
    Koo, Min-Ho
    Cho, Byong Wook
    Oh, Yong Hwa
    Kim, Yongje
    Cho, Soo Young
    Lee, Jung-Yun
    Kim, Yongcheol
    Kim, Dong-Hun
    WATER, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 11
  • [46] A geomorphology-based integrated stream-aquifer interaction model for semi-gauged catchments
    Sahoo, Soumyaranjan
    Sahoo, Bhabagrahi
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2019, 33 (09) : 1362 - 1377
  • [47] Factors affecting the measurement of the vertical hydraulic conductivity of a streambed sediment using standpipe tests
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Zhifang
    Guo, Qiaona
    Tang, Yuzhou
    Lu, Wenlong
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (20) : 5204 - 5211
  • [48] Ecohydrological effects of stream-aquifer water interaction: a case study of the Heihe River basin, northwestern China
    Zeng, Yujin
    Xie, Zhenghui
    Yu, Yan
    Liu, Shuang
    Wang, Linying
    Jia, Binghao
    Qin, Peihua
    Chen, Yaning
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (06) : 2333 - 2352
  • [49] New Analytical Models for Flow Induced by Pumping in a Stream-Aquifer System: A New Robin Boundary Condition Reflecting Joint Effect of Streambed Width and Storage
    Huang, Ching-Sheng
    Wang, Zicheng
    Lin, Ye-Chen
    Yeh, Hund-Der
    Yang, Tao
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 56 (04)
  • [50] FACTORS INFLUENCING CRUST TEST FOR INSITU MEASUREMENT OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
    BAKER, FG
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (06) : 1029 - 1032