Factors influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity and their implications on stream-aquifer interaction: a conceptual review

被引:36
|
作者
Naganna, Sujay Raghavendra [1 ]
Deka, Paresh Chandra [1 ]
Ch, Sudheer [2 ]
Hansen, William F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Karnataka, Dept Appl Mech & Hydraul, Mangalore 575025, India
[2] Minist Environm Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi, India
[3] Hansen Hydrol, Lexington, SC USA
关键词
Hydraulic conductivity; Streambed; Stream-aquifer interaction; Anthropogenic activities; Colmation; Fluvial hydrology; Hyporheic zone; SURFACE-WATER INTERACTIONS; RIVER ALLUVIAL-FAN; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; HYPORHEIC EXCHANGE; TROPICAL STREAM; SEDIMENT YIELD; RESIDENCE TIME; GROUNDWATER; FLOW; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-017-0393-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The estimation and modeling of streambed hydraulic conductivity (K) is an emerging interest due to its connection to water quality, aquatic habitat, and groundwater recharge. Existing research has found ways to sample and measure K at specific sites and with laboratory tests. The challenge undertaken was to review progress, relevance, complexity in understanding and modeling via statistical and geostatistical approaches, literature gaps, and suggestions toward future needs. This article provides an overview of factors and processes influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity (K) and its role in the stream-aquifer interaction. During our synthesis, we discuss the influence of geological, hydrological, biological, and anthropogenic factors that lead to variability of streambed substrates. Literature examples document findings to specific sites that help to portray the role of streambed K and other interrelated factors in the modeling of hyporheic and groundwater flow systems. However, studies utilizing an integrated, comprehensive database are limited, restricting the ability of broader application and understanding. Examples of in situ and laboratory methods of estimating hydraulic conductivity suggest challenges in acquiring representative samples and comparing results, considering the anisotropy and heterogeneity of fluvial bed materials and geohydrological conditions. Arriving at realistic statistical and spatial inference based on field and lab data collected is challenging, considering the possible sediment sources, processes, and complexity. Recognizing that the K for a given particle size group includes several to many orders of magnitude, modeling of streambed K and groundwater interaction remain conceptual and experimental. Advanced geostatistical techniques offer a wide range of univariate or multi-variate interpolation procedures such as kriging and variogram analysis that can be applied to these complex systems. Research available from various studies has been instrumental in developing sampling options, recognizing the significance of fluvial dynamics, the potential for filtration, transfer, and storage of high-quality groundwater, and importance to aquatic habitat and refuge during extreme conditions. Efforts in the characterization of natural and anthropogenic conditions, substrate materials, sediment loading, colmation, and other details highlight the great complexity and perhaps need for a database to compile relevant data. The effects on streambed hydraulic conductivity due to anthropogenic disturbances (in-stream gravel mining, contaminant release, benthic activity, etc.) are the areas that still need focus. An interdisciplinary (hydro-geo-biological) approach may be necessary to characterize the magnitude and variability of streambed K and fluxes at local, regional scales.
引用
收藏
页码:24765 / 24789
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity and their implications on stream–aquifer interaction: a conceptual review
    Sujay Raghavendra Naganna
    Paresh Chandra Deka
    Sudheer Ch
    William F. Hansen
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 24765 - 24789
  • [2] RETRACTED: Significance of streambed hydraulic conductivity in stream-aquifer interaction - A systematic review of fundamentals and recent research (vol 578, pg 256, 2016) (Retracted Article)
    Sujay, Raghavendra N.
    Deka, Paresh Chandra
    Sudheer, Ch
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 578 : 256 - 256
  • [3] Factors Influencing the Stream-Aquifer Flow Exchange Coefficient
    Morel-Seytoux, Hubert J.
    Mehl, Steffen
    Morgado, Kyle
    GROUNDWATER, 2014, 52 (05) : 775 - 781
  • [4] Numerical modelling of stream-aquifer interaction: Quantifying the impact of transient streambed permeability and aquifer heterogeneity
    Zhou, Dan
    Zhang, Ye
    Gianni, Guillaume
    Lichtner, Peter
    Engelhardt, Irina
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2018, 32 (14) : 2279 - 2292
  • [5] Sensitivity of stream-aquifer seepage to spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer
    Bruen, MP
    Osman, YZ
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 293 (1-4) : 289 - 302
  • [6] A quantitative analysis of hydraulic interaction processes in stream-aquifer systems
    Wenke Wang
    Zhenxue Dai
    Yaqian Zhao
    Junting Li
    Lei Duan
    Zhoufeng Wang
    Lin Zhu
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [7] Hydraulic analysis on stream-aquifer interaction by storage function models
    Harada, M
    Hantush, MM
    Mariño, MA
    GROUND WATER UPDATES, 2000, : 229 - 234
  • [8] Estimation of hydraulic diffusivity in stream-aquifer system
    Mishra, GC
    Jain, SK
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [9] ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS TO THE STREAM-AQUIFER INTERACTION PROBLEM: A CRITICAL REVIEW
    Spanoudaki, K.
    Nanou-Giannarou, A.
    Paschalinos, Y.
    Memos, C. D.
    Stamou, A. I.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (02): : 126 - 139
  • [10] Nonlinear effects of locally heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity fields on regional stream-aquifer exchanges
    Zhu, J.
    Winter, C. L.
    Wang, Z.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (11) : 4531 - 4545