Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis

被引:11
|
作者
Tsahtsarlis, Antonio [1 ]
Wood, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mater Private Hosp, Mater Neurosci Ctr, Brisbane Clin Neurosci Ctr, Mater Private Clin, Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
关键词
Minimally invasive; Spondylolisthesis; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions; FOLLOW-UP; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2011.10.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis. A prospective analysis was conducted of 23 consecutive patients with grade I or grade II lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent a MI-TLIF using image guidance between August 2008 and September 2010. The patient group comprised 13 males and 10 females (mean age 57 years), 22 of whom underwent single level fusion and one patient with a two level fusion. All patients underwent postoperative CT scans to assess pedicle screw and cage placement and fusion at six months. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded preoperatively and at the six-month follow-up. We found that 22 of 23 (95.7%) patients showed evidence of fusion at six months with a mean improvement of 26.7 on ODI scores. The mean length of hospital stay was four days. The mean operative time was 172 minutes. Anatomical reduction of the spondylolisthesis was complete in 16 patients and incomplete in seven. Regarding complications, we observed: one of 94 (1.1%) pedicle screws misplaced, which did not require revision postoperatively: one of 23 patients (4.3%) with a pulmonary embolism and one of 23 (4.3%) patients with transient nerve root pain. There were no occurrences of infection and no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks. We conclude that MI-TLIF offers patients a safe and effective surgical option for lumbar spondylolisthesis treatment. Furthermore, it may offer patients additional advantages in terms of postoperative pain and recovery. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 861
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [42] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [43] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [44] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101
  • [45] Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease
    Zhang, Xuelei
    Zhang, Yu
    Gu, Zuchao
    Li, Guo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [46] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Grade I Versus Grade II Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    Shifflett, Grant D.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02): : 108 - 114
  • [47] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Auffinger, Brenda
    Wong, Ricky H.
    Lam, Sandi K.
    Lawton, Cort D.
    Nixon, Alexander T.
    Dahdaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [48] Reduction of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A technical note
    Chang, Peng-Yuan
    Liao, Chih-Hsiang
    Wu, Jau-Ching
    Tu, Tsung-Hsi
    Fay, Li-Yu
    Huang, Wen-Cheng
    Cheng, Henrich
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 2 (02): : 79 - 82
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques
    Tender, G. C.
    Serban, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 812 - 821
  • [50] Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Silva, Pedro S.
    Pereira, Paulo
    Monteiro, Pedro
    Silva, Pedro A.
    Vaz, Rui
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)