Using Systematic Conservation Planning to support Marine Spatial Planning and achieve marine protection targets in the transboundary Benguela Ecosystem

被引:29
|
作者
Kirkman, Stephen P. [1 ]
Holness, Stephen [2 ]
Harris, Linda R. [2 ]
Sink, Kerry J. [2 ,3 ]
Lombard, Amanda T. [2 ]
Kainge, Paulus [4 ]
Majiedt, Prideel [3 ]
Nsiangango, Silvi E. [5 ]
Nsingi, Kumbi K. [6 ]
Samaai, Toufiek [1 ]
机构
[1] Oceans & Coastal Res, Dept Environm Affairs, POB 52126, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Nelson Mandela Univ, Inst Coastal & Marine Res, Dept Zool, POB 77000, ZA-6031 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[3] Kirstenbosch, South African Natl Biodivers Inst, Ctr Biodivers Conservat, Rhodes Ave, ZA-7700 Newlands, South Africa
[4] Minist Fisheries & Marine Resources, Natl Marine Informat & Res Ctr NatMIRC, POB 912, Swakopmund, Namibia
[5] Minist Agr & Desenvolvimento Rural & Pescas, Inst Nacl Invest Pesqueira, Ilha de Luanda 2601, Luanda, Angola
[6] Benguela Current Convent, Private Bag 5031, Swakopmund, Namibia
关键词
Marine protected areas; Ecologically or biologically significant marine areas; Ecosystem mapping; Ocean zoning; Large marine ecosystem; BIODIVERSITY; AREAS; SERVICES; IMPACTS; OCEAN; WORLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.038
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem (BCLME) is subject to moderate to high levels of fishing, mining and numerous other human pressures, all of which are set to intensify through current socio-economic development initiatives in Angola, Namibia and South Africa. There is, however, minimal spatial protection of marine and coastal ecosystems in the region, potentially reducing the sustainability of the planned development and the likelihood of achieving Sustainable Development Goals. As a precursor to Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) processes in the three countries, and to guide establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), this study aimed to: assess two headline indicators of ecosystem status, namely their potential threat status and current spatial protection levels; and to use Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) to prioritise specific areas for protection to achieve networks of MPAs that are representative of national and regional biodiversity. Two hundred and forty eight ecosystem types in the coastal (n = 134), offshore benthic (n = 86) and pelagic (n = 28) zones of the BCLME were classified, mapped and assessed. Overall, 35% of all ecosystem types in the study domain were threatened, with more threatened coastal (37%) and offshore benthic (37%) ecosystem types compared to pelagic ecosystem types (14%), although the same pattern was not necessarily evident within each country. Nearly two thirds (59%) of the BCLME ecosystem types were not protected in MPAs, and most of those that were well (19%) or moderately protected (14%) were coastal types that are within a single extensive MPA in Namibia. Notwithstanding, there was still a sufficient area of most ecosystem types that was assessed to be in good ecological condition in all three countries and that could be prioritised for representative protection of the region's biodiversity. A portfolio of priority conservation areas was identified from Marxan selection-frequency outputs, providing a spatial vision for protected areas in the BCLME that includes coastal, inshore and offshore areas in all three countries. This first assessment of marine ecosystem threat and protection status for an entire LME demonstrates a rapid science-based approach that can inform integrated ocean management and multiple development goals. The study provides a basis for identifying Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas, potential sites for MPAs or other spatial management in the region, and demonstrates the contribution of SCP and spatial management to MSP.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 129
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using ecological modelling in marine spatial planning to enhance ecosystem-based management
    Shabtay, Ateret
    Portman, Michelle E.
    Ofir, Eyal
    Carmel, Yohay
    Gal, Gideon
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 95 : 14 - 23
  • [32] The development of spatial decision support system tool for marine spatial planning
    Sutrisno, Dewayany
    Gill, Suzan Novtalia
    Suseno, Suseno
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2018, 11 (09) : 863 - 879
  • [33] The development of a spatial data infrastructure to support marine spatial planning in Greece
    Vaitis, Michail
    Kopsachilis, Vasilis
    Tataris, Georgios
    Michalakis, Vyron-Ignatios
    Pavlogeorgatos, Gerasimos
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 218
  • [34] Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea
    Morf, Andrea
    Moodie, John
    Gee, Kira
    Giacometti, Alberto
    Kull, Michael
    Piwowarczyk, Joanna
    Schiele, Kerstin
    Zaucha, Jacek
    Kellecioglu, Ilhan
    Luttmann, Anne
    Strand, Helena
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 177 : 200 - 212
  • [35] Marine Spatial Planning in a Transboundary Context: Linking Baja California with California's Network of Marine Protected Areas
    Arafeh-Dalmau, Nur
    Torres-Moye, Guillermo
    Seingier, Georges
    Montano-Moctezuma, Gabriela
    Micheli, Fiorenza
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 4
  • [36] Could European marine conservation policy benefit from systematic conservation planning?
    Giakoumi, Sylvaine
    Katsanevakis, Stelios
    Vassilopoulou, Vassiliki
    Panayotidis, Panayotis
    Kavadas, Stefanos
    Issaris, Yiannis
    Kokkali, Athina
    Frantzis, Alexandros
    Panou, Aliki
    Mavrommati, Georgia
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 22 (06) : 762 - 775
  • [37] The Way Forward on Ecosystem-Based Marine Spatial Planning in the EU
    Kirkfeldt, Trine Skovgaard
    van Tatenhove, Jan P. M.
    Calado, Helena M. G. P.
    [J]. COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 50 (01) : 29 - 44
  • [38] Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning
    Lester, Sarah E.
    Costello, Christopher
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Gaines, Steven D.
    White, Crow
    Barth, John A.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2013, 38 : 80 - 89
  • [39] Editorial: Spatial planning for sustainable use of marine ecosystem services and resources
    Bonnevie, Ida Maria
    von Thenen, Miriam
    Hansen, Henning Sten
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [40] ASPECTS OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING AND GOVERNANCE: ADAPTING TO THE TRANSBOUNDARY NATURE AND THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF THE SEA
    Papageorgiou, Marilena
    Kyvelou, Stella
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (01) : 31 - 37