共 50 条
Antithrombotic Treatment of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source RE-SPECT ESUS Elderly and Renally Impaired Subgroups
被引:24
|作者:
Diener, Hans-Christoph
[1
]
Sacco, Ralph L.
[2
]
Easton, J. Donald
[3
]
Granger, Christopher B.
[4
]
Bar, Michal
[5
]
Bernstein, Richard A.
[6
]
Brainin, Michael
[7
]
Brueckmann, Martina
[8
,9
]
Cronin, Lisa
[10
]
Donnan, Geoffrey
[11
]
Gdovinova, Zuzana
[12
]
Grauer, Claudia
[13
]
Kleine, Eva
[14
]
Kleinig, Timothy J.
[15
]
Lyrer, Philippe
[16
]
Martins, Sheila
[17
]
Meyerhoff, Juliane
[18
]
Milling, Truman
[19
]
Pfeilschifter, Waltraud
[20
]
Poli, Sven
[21
,22
]
Reif, Michal
[23
]
Rose, David Z.
[24
]
Sanak, Daniel
[25
]
Schaebitz, Wolf-Ruediger
[26
]
机构:
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Fac Med, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Miami, Clin & Translat Sci, Miller Sch Med, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[5] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Neurol, Ostrava Poruba Poruba, Czech Republic
[6] Northwestern Univ, Dept Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Danube Univ Krems, Dept Neurosci & Prevent Med, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
[8] Boehringer Ingelheim Int GmbH, Metab Med, Ingelheim, Germany
[9] Heidelberg Univ, Fac Med Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
[10] Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Cardiometab Med, Burlington, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Melbourne, Dept Neurol, Melbourne Brain Ctr, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[12] Pavol Jozef Safarik Univ Kosice, Univ Hosp Pasteur, Dept Neurol, Kosice, Slovakia
[13] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Clin Operat Global, Biberach, Germany
[14] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Biostat & Data Sci, Ingelheim, Germany
[15] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Neurol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[16] Univ Hosp Basel, Stroke Ctr, Div Neurol, Basel, Switzerland
[17] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Neurol Serv, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[18] Boehringer Ingelheim Int GmbH, Cardiol Med, Ingelheim, Germany
[19] Seton Dell Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Dept Surg & Perioperat Care, Stroke Inst, Austin, TX USA
[20] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Ctr Neurol & Neurosurg, Frankfurt, Germany
[21] Univ Tubingen, Dept Neurol Focus Neurovasc Dis & Neurooncol, Tubingen, Germany
[22] Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Tubingen, Germany
[23] Cerebrovaskularni Ambulance Sro, Dept Neurol, Brno, Czech Republic
[24] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[25] Palacky Univ, Comprehens Stroke Ctr, Dept Neurol, Olomouc, Czech Republic
[26] Evangel Klinikum Bethel, Dept Neurol, Bielefeld, Germany
来源:
关键词:
anticoagulants;
atrial fibrillation;
cardiovascular disease;
risk factors;
secondary prevention;
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL RATIONALE;
ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION;
DABIGATRAN;
PREVENTION;
APIXABAN;
EFFICACY;
SAFETY;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028643
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background and Purpose- The RE-SPECT ESUS trial (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) tested the hypothesis that dabigatran would be superior to aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. This exploratory subgroup analysis investigates the impact of age, renal function (both predefined), and dabigatran dose (post hoc) on the rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Methods- RE-SPECT ESUS was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of dabigatran 150 or 110 mg (for patients aged >= 75 years and/or with creatinine clearance 30 to <50 mL/minute) twice daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. Results- The trial, which enrolled 5390 patients from December 2014 to January 2018, did not demonstrate superiority of dabigatran versus aspirin for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. However, among the population qualifying for the lower dabigatran dose, the rate of recurrent stroke was reduced with dabigatran versus aspirin (7.4% versus 13.0%; hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39-0.82]; interaction P=0.01). This was driven mainly by the subgroup aged >= 75 years (7.8% versus 12.4%; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.43-0.94]; interaction P=0.10). Stroke rates tended to be lower with dabigatran versus aspirin with declining renal function. Risks for major bleeding were similar between treatments, irrespective of renal function, but with a trend for lower bleeding rates with dabigatran versus aspirin in older patients. Conclusions- In subgroup analyses of RE-SPECT ESUS, dabigatran reduced the rate of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin in patients qualifying for the lower dose of dabigatran. These results are hypothesis-generating. Aspirin remains the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Registration- URL: ; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.
引用
收藏
页码:1758 / 1765
页数:8
相关论文