High-Fidelity Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Simulation Reviews

被引:74
|
作者
Doolen, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Mariani, Bette [3 ]
Atz, Teresa [4 ]
Horsley, Trisha Leann [5 ]
Rourke, Jennifer O' [6 ]
McAfee, Kelley [7 ]
Cross, Chad L. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Nursing, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Clin Simulat Ctr Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106 USA
[3] Villanova Univ, Coll Nursing, Nursing, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, HealthCare Simulat Ctr SC, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Loyola Univ Chicago, Marcella Niehoff Sch Nursing, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Coll Nursing, Clin Learning Resource Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Coll Nursing, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[8] Nevada State Coll, Sch Liberal Arts & Sci, Math, Henderson, NV 89002 USA
关键词
undergraduate nursing students; high-fidelity simulation; simulation; integrative review; meta-analysis; systematic review; PATIENT SIMULATION; SAFETY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.009
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The purpose of this focused review was to provide an overview of existing high-fidelity simulation reviews in undergraduate nursing education. Over the last 10 years, there has been a substantial increase in the use of high-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education. Six reviewers conducted a systematic literature search on existing reviews of high-fidelity simulation and undergraduate nursing education from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2015. Using a comprehensive search of literature databases and hand searches, a total of 34 reviews were initially selected for full review with seven reviews included in the final analysis after rereview of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Findings from simulation research and reviews revealed significant differences in design and assessment methods leading to a wide variety of measurement outcomes and a variety of limitations. Of the seven reviews, five were integrative reviews and two were reviews of the literature. No meta-analysis or systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The review suggests a need for methodologically sound research that translates simulation outcomes to future performance and practice. Findings from the review support the multitude of challenges in simulation research including a lack of funding, a lack of simulation training for faculty and staff, and a lack of support for faculty conducting simulation research. Limitations of prior studies include weak designs, mixed samples, and a lack of valid and reliable evaluation tools. (C) 2016 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 302
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条