High-Fidelity Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Simulation Reviews

被引:74
|
作者
Doolen, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Mariani, Bette [3 ]
Atz, Teresa [4 ]
Horsley, Trisha Leann [5 ]
Rourke, Jennifer O' [6 ]
McAfee, Kelley [7 ]
Cross, Chad L. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Nursing, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Clin Simulat Ctr Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89106 USA
[3] Villanova Univ, Coll Nursing, Nursing, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, HealthCare Simulat Ctr SC, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Loyola Univ Chicago, Marcella Niehoff Sch Nursing, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Coll Nursing, Clin Learning Resource Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Coll Nursing, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[8] Nevada State Coll, Sch Liberal Arts & Sci, Math, Henderson, NV 89002 USA
关键词
undergraduate nursing students; high-fidelity simulation; simulation; integrative review; meta-analysis; systematic review; PATIENT SIMULATION; SAFETY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.009
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The purpose of this focused review was to provide an overview of existing high-fidelity simulation reviews in undergraduate nursing education. Over the last 10 years, there has been a substantial increase in the use of high-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education. Six reviewers conducted a systematic literature search on existing reviews of high-fidelity simulation and undergraduate nursing education from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2015. Using a comprehensive search of literature databases and hand searches, a total of 34 reviews were initially selected for full review with seven reviews included in the final analysis after rereview of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Findings from simulation research and reviews revealed significant differences in design and assessment methods leading to a wide variety of measurement outcomes and a variety of limitations. Of the seven reviews, five were integrative reviews and two were reviews of the literature. No meta-analysis or systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The review suggests a need for methodologically sound research that translates simulation outcomes to future performance and practice. Findings from the review support the multitude of challenges in simulation research including a lack of funding, a lack of simulation training for faculty and staff, and a lack of support for faculty conducting simulation research. Limitations of prior studies include weak designs, mixed samples, and a lack of valid and reliable evaluation tools. (C) 2016 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 302
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: A meta-analysis
    Li, Yue Yi
    Au, Mio Leng
    Tong, Lai Kun
    Ng, Wai I.
    Wang, Si Chen
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 111
  • [2] High-Fidelity Patient Simulation in Nursing Education: An Integrative Review
    Weaver, Amy
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 32 (01) : 37 - 40
  • [3] High-Fidelity Simulation Debriefing in Nursing Education: A Literature Review
    Goes, Fernanda
    Jackman, Deirdre
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2018, 17 (01):
  • [4] High-Fidelity Simulation for Neonatal Nursing Education: An Integrative Review of the Literature
    Cooper, Allyson
    [J]. NEONATAL NETWORK, 2015, 34 (06): : 345 - 354
  • [5] High-Fidelity Simulation in an Undergraduate Ambulatory Care Nursing Course
    Coburn, Caroline, V
    Gilland, Deena
    Stahl, Katherine
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 41 (01) : 54 - 56
  • [6] Implementing High-Fidelity Simulation in Practical Nursing Education
    Maas, Nancy A.
    Flood, Lisa Sue
    [J]. CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2011, 7 (06) : E229 - E235
  • [7] A scoping review of the integration of ethics education in undergraduate nursing high-fidelity human simulation-based learning
    Sedgwick, Monique
    Yanicki, Sharon
    Harder, Nicole
    Scott, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (5-6) : 605 - 614
  • [8] Undergraduate interprofessional education using high-fidelity paediatric simulation
    Stewart, Moira
    Kennedy, Neil
    Cuene-Grandidier, Hazel
    [J]. CLINICAL TEACHER, 2010, 7 (02): : 90 - 96
  • [9] High-fidelity human simulation in nursing education: A review of literature and guide for implementation
    Hyland, Judy R.
    Hawkins, Margaret C.
    [J]. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN NURSING, 2009, 4 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [10] The efficacy of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge and performance in undergraduate nursing students: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Vangone, Ida
    Arrigoni, Cristina
    Magon, Arianna
    Conte, Gianluca
    Russo, Sara
    Belloni, Silvia
    Stievano, Alessandro
    Alfes, Celeste M.
    Caruso, Rosario
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 139