Underestimating the severity of bipolar depression: a comparison of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale items

被引:10
|
作者
Sung, Gyhye [1 ]
Kim, Bin-Na [1 ]
Lee, Eun-Ho [1 ]
Yu, Bum-Hee [1 ]
Hong, Kyung Sue [1 ]
Kim, Ji-Hae [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
Bipolar depression; Unipolar depression; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; Severity of depression; CLINICAL-FEATURES; UNIPOLAR; DISORDER; DISTINCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is a clinician-rated instrument to assess the severity of depressive symptoms that does not account for the differences between bipolar (BP) and unipolar (UP) disorders. This study attempts to evaluate differences in the total scores of the HDRS, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings of patients with bipolar II (BP-II) and UP depression. Each factor and item of the HDRS was compared between the two groups in order to identify specific symptoms. Methods: 588 patients with bipolar II disorder (n=101) and major depressive disorder (n=487) were enrolled in this study. All participants completed the BDI and individually interviewed using HDRS. Each participant was also evaluated with regard to global functioning. Results: The BP group scored lower on the total HDRS and all of the factors. The BP and UP groups did not differ in terms of BDI and GAF. With regard to the individual items of HORS, the BP group scored lower on items associated with 'Depressed mood', 'Work and interest', 'Somatic, gastro', and 'Hypochondriasis'. Limitations: There was a significant age differences between the two groups. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the severity of bipolar depression may be less well-recognized by the HDRS due to the different presentations of depressive symptoms. Thus, the clinician should be careful not to underestimate the sincerity of patients' reports when evaluating depression. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 429
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A NEW VALIDATION OF THE HAMILTON RATING-SCALE FOR DEPRESSION
    RAMOSBRIEVA, JA
    CORDEROVILLAFAFILA, A
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1988, 22 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [42] HAMILTON RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION - FACTOR-ANALYSIS
    MOWBRAY, RM
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1972, 2 (03) : 272 - +
  • [43] Measuring Depression at the End of Life Is the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale a Valid Instrument?
    Olden, Megan
    Rosenfeld, Barry
    Pessin, Hayley
    Breitbart, William
    ASSESSMENT, 2009, 16 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [44] WHAT IS NOT "EFFECTIVE" IN MILD TO MODERATE DEPRESSION: ANTIDEPRESSANTS OR THE HAMILTON RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION?
    Salum, Giovanni Abrahao
    Manfro, Gisele Gus
    Fleck, Marcelo P.
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2011, 16 (04) : 99 - 99
  • [45] The choice of anesthetics and the effect on the Hamilton depression rating scale in therapy resistant depression
    van Mensvoort, F.
    Permuy, R. Teijeiro
    Rijnders, C.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 : S327 - S328
  • [46] THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING SCALE CANNOT RELIABLY MEASURE MILD OR MODERATE DEPRESSION
    Isacsson, G.
    Adler, M.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27
  • [47] RATING WEIGHT-LOSS ON THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE
    RAUSCH, JL
    SANCHEZ, M
    ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 46 (05) : 481 - 482
  • [48] Exploring clinical characteristics of bipolar depression: internal structure of the bipolar depression rating scale
    Chang, Jae Seung
    Ahn, Yong Min
    Yu, Han Young
    Park, Hye Jean
    Lee, Kyu Young
    Kim, Se Hyun
    Kim, Yong Sik
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 43 (09): : 830 - 837
  • [49] A comparative psychometric study of the Spanish versions with 6, 17, and 21 items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
    Bobes, J
    Bulbena, A
    Luque, A
    Dal-Ré, R
    Ballesteros, J
    Ibarra, N
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2003, 120 (18): : 693 - 700
  • [50] Validation of the Hamilton Depression rating scale and Montgommery and Asberg Rating Scales in terms of AGECAT depression cases
    Mottram, P
    Wilson, K
    Copeland, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 15 (12) : 1113 - 1119