How Analysts Think: Decision Making in the Absence of Clear Facts

被引：0
|
作者：
Gerber, Matylda [1 ]
Wong, B. L. William [2 ]
Kodagoda, Neesha [2 ]
机构：
[1] Warsaw Sch Econ, Dept World Econ, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Middlesex Univ, Interact Design Ctr, London, England
来源：
2016 EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS CONFERENCE (EISIC) | 2016年
关键词：
intuition; leap of faith; insight; analysts' decision making; system design; human-computer interaction;
D O I：
10.1109/EISIC.2016.52
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
In this paper we present findings from our research into how criminal intelligence analysts make decisions in the absence of clear facts. We used the Emergent Themes Analysis method to analyze interview transcripts of seven analysts to discover how intuition, leap of faith and insight help analysts use suppositions to deal with missing or ambiguous data. We discovered that the sequence of cognitive acts - intuition, leap of faith and insight - is a reliable and helpful strategy analysts utilize to make decisions in the absence of clear facts. This finding suggests the importance for supporting decision making based on those cognitive acts in the system design.
引用
收藏
页码：132 / 135
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cyber security: Influence of patching vulnerabilities on the decision-making of hackers and analysts
    Maqbool, Zahid
    Pammi, V. S. Chandrasekhar
    Dutt, Varun
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER SITUATIONAL AWARENESS, DATA ANALYTICS AND ASSESSMENT (CYBER SA), 2018,
  • [42] Designing a Vulnerability Management Dashboard to Enhance Security Analysts' Decision Making Processes
    Manatova, Dalyapraz
    Kouper, Inna
    Samtani, Sagar
    PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE IN ADVANCED RESEARCH COMPUTING 2022, 2022,
  • [43] Clinical Decision Making: Assumptions Made in the Absence of Evidence
    Sexton, Patrick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC THERAPY & TRAINING, 2011, 16 (02): : 1 - 3
  • [44] On Chinese Think Tank' Role in Making Public Decision Making More Scientific and Democratic
    Hao Xujie
    Jin Haihe
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (10TH), VOL II, 2014, : 175 - 181
  • [45] How Can Decision Making Be Improved?
    Milkman, Katherine L.
    Chugh, Dolly
    Bazerman, Max H.
    PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 4 (04) : 379 - 383
  • [46] How Anger Poisons Decision Making
    Lerner, Jennifer S.
    Shonk, Katherine
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2010, 88 (09) : 26 - 26
  • [47] To clear or not to clear: Unpacking soy farmers' decision-making on deforestation in Brazil's Cerrado
    Aragao, Rafaela Barbosa de Andrade
    Lima, Mairon G. Bastos
    Burns, Georgette Leah
    Ross, Helen
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [48] SCIENCE FACTS VERSUS PERCEPTION IN THE PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    KEITH, SJ
    GROUND WATER, 1986, 24 (03) : 298 - 301
  • [49] Optimizing Decision Making for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Facts Over Fear
    Punglia, Rinaa S.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (05): : 511 - 512
  • [50] Think twice: Impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder
    Grassi, Giacomo
    Pallanti, Stefano
    Righi, Lorenzo
    Figee, Martijn
    Mantione, Mariska
    Denys, Damiaan
    Piccagliani, Daniele
    Rossi, Alessandro
    Stratta, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2015, 4 (04) : 263 - 272
12345