An economic evaluation of two watershed management practices in Taiwan

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, HJ [1 ]
Hu, SC
Kao, CC
机构
[1] Natl Dong Hwa Univ, Inst Nat Resources, Hualien 974, Taiwan
[2] Taiwan Forestry Res Inst, Div Watershed Management, Taipei 107, Taiwan
关键词
benefit-cost analysis; net present value; watershed management; soil conservation; sustainable development; Taiwan;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb00957.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the management practice effects on Ming-Hu and Ming-Tan reservoir watersheds during the past 15 years. It is difficult to economically evaluate a watershed project consisting of a number of multisectoral and long term management practices and regulations. However, the reservoirs' hydropower operations and their associated benefits and costs are highlighted in this study. The estimated management practice value (net present value) of 351 million NT (New Taiwan) dollars and a benefit-cost ratio of 1.189 are obtained for the Ming-Hu subwatershed. Because the Ming-Tan hydropower station only began commercial operation in 1992 the estimated management practice value is negative 103 million NT dollars (net present value) and the benefit-cost ratio is 0.653 in the Ming-Tan subwatershed. If the analysis period is contained to the year 2010, the benefit-cost ratio of Ming-Tan reservoir subwatershed becomes 1.103. Ming-Hu and Ming-Tan subwatersheds together share the benefit-cost ratio of 1.182 and the net present value of 1,589 million NT dollars. The results of the analyses indicate that the Taiwan Power Company, the watershed management agency, has implemented economically efficient watershed practices and regulations in Ming-Hu and Ming-Tan reservoir watersheds and the watershed management practices are worthwhile and should be sustained.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 602
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Watershed management for disaster mitigation and sustainable development in Taiwan
    Cheng, JD
    Hsu, HK
    Ho, WJ
    Chen, TC
    LAND STEWARDSHIP IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, (13): : 138 - 148
  • [32] Economic Evaluation of Badrigad Watershed, Uttarakhand
    Chandra, Subhash
    Raverkar, K. P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 12 (02) : 293 - 300
  • [33] Improving watershed management practices in humid regions
    Zimale, Fasikaw A.
    Tilahun, Seifu A.
    Tebebu, Tigist Y.
    Guzman, Christian D.
    Hoang, Linh
    Schneiderman, Elliot M.
    Langendoen, Eddy J.
    Steenhuis, Tammo S.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2017, 31 (18) : 3294 - 3301
  • [34] Economic Assessment of Best Management Practices in the Mara River Basin: Toward Implementing Payment for Watershed Services
    George Atisa
    Mahadev G. Bhat
    Michael E. McClain
    Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 1751 - 1766
  • [35] Economic Assessment of Best Management Practices in the Mara River Basin: Toward Implementing Payment for Watershed Services
    Atisa, George
    Bhat, Mahadev G.
    McClain, Michael E.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (06) : 1751 - 1766
  • [36] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF SOME WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ON FOREST LAND IN WEST-VIRGINIA
    WORLEY, DP
    PATRIC, JH
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1971, 7 (04) : 812 - &
  • [37] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF SOME WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ON FOREST LAND IN WEST-VIRGINIA
    WORLEY, DP
    PATRIC, JH
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1970, 51 (04): : 280 - &
  • [38] MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - CASE OF TAIWAN
    NEGANDHI, AR
    STUDIES IN SOCIAL LIFE, 1973, (17): : 1 - 176
  • [39] Evaluation of the Impact of Best Management Practices on Streamflow, Sediment and Nutrient Yield at Field and Watershed Scales
    Avay Risal
    Prem B. Parajuli
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 1093 - 1105
  • [40] Evaluation of the Impact of Best Management Practices on Streamflow, Sediment and Nutrient Yield at Field and Watershed Scales
    Risal, Avay
    Parajuli, Prem B.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (03) : 1093 - 1105