Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs: Rebates and white certificates

被引:18
|
作者
Transue, Morghan [1 ]
Felder, Frank A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Energy Econ & Environm Policy, Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Energy efficiency; Rebates; White tags;
D O I
10.1016/j.jup.2009.12.003
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
With increased interest in energy efficiency in recent years, energy efficiency portfolio standards (EEPS) have gained popularity in state policymaking. This analysis employed New Jersey specific data to compare two incentive based approaches to EEPS implementation: rebates and white certificates. Quantitative modeling suggests that white certificate approaches that depend on market-clearing prices generate much larger upfront incentive outlays than rebate programs. They do not however increase societal burden. Both programs overcome high upfront efficiency measure costs and both recoup the expenses over the long run. Administration costs and participation rates can affect this dynamic however and require additional research to determine which approaches are most cost effective for various energy efficiency measures. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:103 / 111
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy Performance Certificates and investments in building energy efficiency: A theoretical analysis
    Fleckinger, Pierre
    Glachant, Matthieu
    Kamga, Paul-Herve Tamokoue
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 84
  • [22] Rethinking Incentive Policy for Building Energy Efficiency
    Yang, Jie
    Xu, Cong
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND BUILDING MATERIAL, PTS 1-4, 2012, 374-377 : 195 - 198
  • [23] Analysis of Improvement in the Energy Efficiency of Office Buildings Based on Energy Performance Certificates
    Bliūdžius, Raimondas
    Banionis, Karolis
    Monstvilas, Edmundas
    Norvaišienė, Rosita
    Adilova, Dinarr
    Prozuments, Aleksejs
    Borodinecs, Anatolijs
    Buildings, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [24] A bright future: Market transformation in texas lighting efficiency incentive programs
    Baker, C., 1600, Taylor & Francis Group LLC (110):
  • [25] A COMPARISON OF FOCUS AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EUROPEAN VERSUS US ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS FOR BUILDINGS
    Reichard, Georg
    Bhattacharjee, Suchismita
    ES2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 1, 2009, : 75 - 84
  • [26] Design of capacity incentive and energy compensation for demand response programs
    Liu, Zhoubin
    Cui, Wenqi
    Shen, Ran
    Hu, Yishuang
    Wu, Hui
    Ye, Chengjin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (EEEP2017), 2018, 121
  • [27] Efficiency and distributional impacts of tradable white certificates compared to taxes, subsidies and regulations
    Giraudet, Louis-Gaetan
    Quirion, Philippe
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2008, 118 (06): : 885 - 914
  • [28] Economic Incentive Policy in Building Energy Efficiency Market
    Qin Xuan
    Guo Yanhong
    CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 85 - 90
  • [29] Application of Incentive Mechanism in Building Energy Efficiency Regulation
    Liu, Hongwei
    Wang, Zhuofu
    Li, Jun
    FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-8, 2011, 71-78 : 242 - +
  • [30] Social Game for Building Energy Efficiency:Incentive Design
    Ratliff, Lillian J.
    Jin, Ming
    Konstantakopoulos, Ioannis C.
    Spanos, Costas
    Sastry, S. Shankar
    2014 52ND ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING (ALLERTON), 2014, : 1011 - 1018