Comparative efficacy and acceptability of atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, bupropion and methylphenidate in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis with focus on bupropion

被引:54
|
作者
Stuhec, Matej [1 ]
Munda, Barbara [2 ]
Svab, Vesna [3 ]
Locatelli, Igor [2 ]
机构
[1] Ormoz Psychiat Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, Ormoz 2270, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Chair Social Pharm, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Ljubljana 1104, Slovenia
关键词
Bupropion; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Meta-analysis; Efficacy; Acceptability; Child and adolescent psychiatry; ONCE-DAILY ATOMOXETINE; PROOF-OF-CONCEPT; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY-DISORDER; DOUBLE-BLIND; OROS METHYLPHENIDATE; A-DAY; PLACEBO; DIMESYLATE; TRIAL; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: There is a lack of comparative effectiveness research among attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) drugs in terms of efficacy and acceptability, where bupropion is compared with atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate. The main aim of this work was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of these drugs in children and adolescents using a metaanalysis. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled, noncrossover studies of ADHD. PubMecl/Medline and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Comparative drug efficacy to placebo was calculated based on the standardized mean difference (SMD), while the comparative drug acceptability (all cause discontinuation) to placebo was estimated on the odds ratio (OR). Results: In total 28 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms compared to placebo was small for bupropion (SMD= -0.32, 95% CI -0.69, 0.05), while modest efficacy was shown for atomoxetine (SfV1D= -0.68, 95% Cl; -0.76, -0.59) and methylphenidate (SMD= -0.75, 95% Cl; -0.98, -0.52) and high efficacy was observed for lisdexamfetamine (SMD= -1.28, 95%, Cl; -1.84, -0.71). Compared to placebo treatment discontinuation was statistically significantly lower for methylphenidate (OR =0.35, 95% Cl, 0.24, 0.52), while it was not significantly different for atomoxetine (OR =0.91, 95% CI; 0.66, 1.24), lisdexamfetamine (OR =0.60, 95% CI, 0.22, 1.65), and bupropion (OR=1.64, 95% Cl; 0.5, 5.43). Limitations: The heterogeneity was high, except in atomoxetine trials. The crossover studies were excluded. The effect sizes at specific time points were not computed. Studies with comorbid conditions, except those reporting on oppositional defiant disorder, were also excluded. All studies involving MPH were combined. Conclusions: The results suggest that lisclexamfetamine has the best benefit risk balance and has promising potential for treating children and adolescents with ADHD. More research is needed for a better clinical evaluation of bupropion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis
    Sarah C. O. S. Padilha
    Suzane Virtuoso
    Fernanda S. Tonin
    Helena H. L. Borba
    Roberto Pontarolo
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2018, 27 : 1335 - 1345
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis
    Padilha, Sarah C. O. S.
    Virtuoso, Suzane
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    Borba, Helena H. L.
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 27 (10) : 1335 - 1345
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Recent Methylphenidate Use
    Rakesh Jain
    Thomas Babcock
    Teodor Burtea
    Bryan Dirks
    Ben Adeyi
    Brian Scheckner
    Robert Lasser
    John Renna
    Don Duncan
    Advances in Therapy, 2013, 30 : 472 - 486
  • [44] A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of bupropion versus methylphenidate in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Maneeton, Narong
    Maneeton, Benchalak
    Intaprasert, Suthi
    Woottiluk, Pakapan
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2014, 10 : 1439 - 1449
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Recent Methylphenidate Use
    Jain, Rakesh
    Babcock, Thomas
    Burtea, Teodor
    Dirks, Bryan
    Adeyi, Ben
    Scheckner, Brian
    Lasser, Robert
    Renna, John
    Duncan, Don
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2013, 30 (05) : 472 - 486
  • [46] Atomoxetine Treatment in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Wietecha, Linda A.
    Williams, David W.
    Herbert, Michael
    Melmed, Raun D.
    Greenbaum, Michael
    Schuh, Kory
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 19 (06) : 719 - 730
  • [47] Meta-analysis on the efficacy of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors reboxetine and atomoxetine for the treatment of schizophrenia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
    Hu, Xiaojing
    Pan, Lili
    Li, Wenjie
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 32 (05): : 511 - 522
  • [48] Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on sleep in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Sangal, RB
    Owens, J
    Allen, AJ
    Kelsey, D
    Sutton, V
    Schuh, KJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 7 : S273 - S273
  • [49] Bupropion for adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials
    Maneeton, Narong
    Maneeton, Benchalak
    Srisurapanont, Manit
    Martin, Stephen D.
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2011, 65 (07) : 611 - 617
  • [50] Comparative Efficacy of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Youths with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Shih, Hsien-Hsueh
    Shang, Chi-Yung
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 9 - 19