An Analysis of Yield Component Changes for New vs. Old Soybean Cultivars

被引:42
|
作者
Kahlon, Charanjit S. [1 ]
Board, James E. [1 ]
Kang, Manjit S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Agr, Sch Plant Environm & Soil Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Punjab Agr Univ, Ludhiana 141004, Punjab, India
关键词
INDIRECT SELECTION CRITERIA; PATH ANALYSES; DRY-MATTER; SEED YIELD; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2010.0300
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Reasons for the gradual genetic yield improvement (10-30 kg ha(-1)yr(-1)) reported for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] during decades of cultivar development are not clearly understood. Identification of mechanisms for the yield improvement would aid in providing indirect selection criteria for streamlining cultivar development. Our objective was to identify yield components responsible for yield improvement in 18 public southern cultivars released between 1953 and 1999. The study was done at the Ben Hur Research Farm near Baton Rouge, LA (30 degrees N Lat) during 2007 and 2008, plus a validation study in 2009. Experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications and one factor (cultivar). In the 2007-2008 study, 18 cultivars released across the 1953-1999 period were selected. Three old and three new cultivars were used for the 2009 validation study. Data were obtained on yield, seed m(-2), seed size, seed per pod, pod m(-2), pod per reproductive node (a reproductive node is one having at least one pod having at least one seed), reproductive node m(-2), percent reproductive nodes and node m(-2). Data were analyzed by ANOVAR and mean separation. Regression and path analyses were also done between yield and yield components, year of release and yield components, and among yield components themselves. Results of the 2007-2008 study indicated that yield differences were sequentially controlled by node m(-2), reproductive node m(-2), pod m(-2), and seed m(-2). However, node m(-2) was not as accurate at distinguishing low and high-yielding cultivars as the other three yield components and its role in yield formation was not substantiated in the validation study. A possible indirect selection criterion for yield during cultivar development is reproductive node m(-2).
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Personality disorders: new data vs. old concepts
    Konstantinos Fountoulakis
    George Kaprinis
    Annals of General Psychiatry, 7 (Suppl 1)
  • [32] 'Old' vs. 'New' Terrorism: What's in a Name?
    Gofas, Andreas
    ULUSLARARASI ILISKILER-INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2012, 8 (32): : 17 - 31
  • [33] Specialization vs. Sectoring - New stand of a old discussion
    Priebe, Stefan
    NERVENARZT, 2007, 78 : 387 - 387
  • [34] ANKARA VS. THE PKK: OLD WAR, NEW STRATEGIES
    Gurcan, Metin
    TURKISH POLICY QUARTERLY, 2016, 14 (04): : 47 - 57
  • [35] OLD MEDIA VS. NEW MEDIA Boxed Out
    Pullen, John Patrick
    FORTUNE, 2009, 159 (11) : 32 - 32
  • [36] Changes in yield and agronomic traits of soybean cultivars released in China in the last 60 years
    Qin, Xiaoliang
    Feng, Fan
    Li, Dexiao
    Herbert, Stephen J.
    Liao, Yuncheng
    Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2017, 68 (10-11): : 973 - 984
  • [37] Principal Component Analysis to Assess the Changes of Yield and Quality of Two Pinellia ternata Cultivars After Brassinolide Treatments
    Guo, Chenchen
    Shen, Yuxiao
    Li, Minghui
    Chen, Ying
    Xu, Xihang
    Chu, Jianzhou
    Yao, Xiaoqin
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2022, 41 (06) : 2185 - 2197
  • [38] Assessment of the Physiological Response and Productive Performance of Vegetable vs. Conventional Soybean Cultivars for Edamame Production
    Ribera, Laura Matos
    Aires, Eduardo Santana
    Neves, Caio Scardini
    Fernandes, Gustavo do Carmo
    Giardini Bonfim, Filipe Pereira
    Rockenbach, Roanita Iara
    Rodrigues, Joao Domingos
    Ono, Elizabeth Orika
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [39] Principal Component Analysis to Assess the Changes of Yield and Quality of Two Pinellia ternata Cultivars After Brassinolide Treatments
    Chenchen Guo
    Yuxiao Shen
    Minghui Li
    Ying Chen
    Xihang Xu
    Jianzhou Chu
    Xiaoqin Yao
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41 : 2185 - 2197