Implementation of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines on Hypertension in Clinical Practice

被引:1
|
作者
Mahato, Poonam [1 ]
Ganesh, Rajan [2 ]
Hanumanthu, Balaram Krishna [1 ]
Rana, Yesha Patel [2 ]
Chan, Jin Ei [1 ]
Alam, Tahmina [2 ]
Misra, Deepika [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Mt Sinai Beth Israel, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, 10 Union Sq E,Ste 2B, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Mt Sinai Beth Israel, Dept Internal Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
OCHSNER JOURNAL | 2021年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
Compliance; guideline adherence; health plan implementation; hypertension; BLOOD-PRESSURE; MANAGEMENT; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.31486/toj.20.0105
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on hypertension recommend a threshold blood pressure (BP) of >= 130/80 mmHg for diagnosis of hypertension and treating hypertension to a goal BP of <130/80 mmHg. For this study, we assessed the rate of compliance to the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines by internal medicine residents and cardiology fellows in clinics affiliated with a teaching hospital in New York, New York. Methods: We conducted a retrospectivemedical records review for patients who had a clinical encounter at the internal medicine resident and cardiology fellowclinics fromJanuary to February 2019. To distinguish from adherencewith prior guidelines, patients with BP of 130-139/80-89 mmHg (unless age >= 60 years and systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140-149 mmHg without chronic kidney disease or diabetes) were included. The primary outcome was accurate assessment of uncontrolled BP in accordance with the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines. Results: Included in the analysis were 435 patients from the internal medicine resident clinic and 127 patients from the cardiology fellow clinic. Accurate assessment of uncontrolled BP was higher in the cardiology fellow clinic compared to the internal medicine resident clinic (29.1% vs 10.3%, P<0.001), even after adjusting for baseline characteristics differences between the 2 clinics. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the type of clinic (internal medicine, odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.160.47; P<0.001), established diagnosis of hypertension (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.06-3.99; P<0.001), and SBP (OR 1.16 per mmHg, 95% CI 1.11-1.22; P=0.031) were independently associated with the primary outcome. Conclusion: Cardiology fellowswere better at identifying hypertension diagnosis thresholds and BP treatment goals in accordance with 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines compared to internal medicine residents.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 260
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines on the Next Blood Pressure Guidelines in Asia
    Naoki Nakagawa
    Naoyuki Hasebe
    Current Hypertension Reports, 2019, 21
  • [42] Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines on the Next Blood Pressure Guidelines in Asia
    Nakagawa, Naoki
    Hasebe, Naoyuki
    CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [43] Prevalence of Hypertension, Treatment, and Blood Pressure Targets in Canada Associated With the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines
    Garies, Stephanie
    Hao, Sylvia
    McBrien, Kerry
    Williamson, Tyler
    Peng, Mingkai
    Khan, Nadia A.
    Padwal, Raj S.
    Quan, Hude
    Leung, Alexander A.
    Tran, Karen
    Tsuyuki, Ross
    McAlister, Finlay A.
    Campbell, Norman R. C.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (03)
  • [44] Hong Kong College of Physicians Position Statement and Recommendations on the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension
    Chan, K. K.
    Szeto, C. C.
    Lum, Christopher C. M.
    Ng, P. W.
    Kong, Alice P. S.
    Lau, K. P.
    Leung, Jenny Y. Y.
    Lui, S. L.
    Mo, K. L.
    Mok, Francis C. K.
    Mok, Vincent C. T.
    Yan, Bryan P. Y.
    Li, Philip K. T.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05) : 432 - 437
  • [45] American College of Cardiology American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part II - Evolutionary changes in a continuous quality improvement project
    Gibbons, RJ
    Smith, SC
    Antman, E
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (24) : 3101 - 3107
  • [46] The 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension and 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines More Similar Than Different
    Whelton, Paul K.
    Williams, Bryan
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (17): : 1749 - 1750
  • [47] Durability of Class I American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations
    Neuman, Mark D.
    Goldstein, Jennifer N.
    Cirullo, Michael A.
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (20): : 2092 - 2100
  • [48] The association between 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for hypertension and neonatal outcomes in Kenya: a retrospective study
    Mami Hitachi
    Kazuchiyo Miyamichi
    Sumihisa Honda
    Violet Wanjihia
    Samson Muuo Nzou
    Satoshi Kaneko
    Tropical Medicine and Health, 53 (1)
  • [49] Perspectives on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Prevention of Infective Endocarditis
    Bach, David S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (20) : 1852 - 1854