Center-of-mass variation under projective transformation

被引:6
|
作者
Steele, R. Matt [1 ]
Jaynes, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Ctr Visual Environm, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
feature detection; geometric transformation invariance; camera calibration;
D O I
10.1016/j.patrec.2007.03.018
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Accurate feature detection and localization is fundamentally important to computer vision, and feature locations act as input to many algorithms including camera calibration, structure recovery, and motion estimation. Unfortunately, feature localizers in common use are typically not projectively invariant even in the idealized case of a continuous image. This results in feature location estimates that contain bias which can influence the higher level algorithms that make use of them. While this behavior has been studied in the case of ellipse centroids and then used in a practical calibration algorithm, those results do not trivially generalize to the center-of-mass of a radially symmetric intensity distribution. This paper introduces the generalized result of feature location bias with respect to perspective distortion and applies it to several specific radially symmetric intensity distributions. The impact on calibration is then evaluated. Finally, an initial study is conducted comparing calibration results obtained using center-of-mass to those obtained with an ellipse detector. Results demonstrate that feature localization error, over a range of increasingly large projective distortions, can be stabilized at less than a tenth of a pixel versus errors that can grow to larger than a pixel in the uncorrected case. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1915 / 1925
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Center-of-mass response of confined systems
    Lemmens, LF
    Brosens, F
    Devreese, JT
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1999, 59 (04): : 3112 - 3115
  • [22] CENTER-OF-MASS MOTION AND SIEGERTS THEOREM
    MOSCONI, B
    RICCI, P
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1987, 36 (01): : 60 - 66
  • [23] OPTIMIZING THE DETERMINATION OF THE BODY CENTER-OF-MASS
    KINGMA, I
    TOUSSAINT, HM
    COMMISSARIS, DACM
    HOOZEMANS, MJM
    OBER, MJ
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (09) : 1137 - 1142
  • [24] CENTER-OF-MASS EFFECTS AT FINITE TEMPERATURE
    QUICK, RM
    MILLER, HG
    VARY, JP
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA A-NUCLEI PARTICLES AND FIELDS, 1987, 97 (03): : 359 - 363
  • [25] CENTER-OF-MASS PERCEPTION - PERTURBATION OF SYMMETRY
    BINGHAM, GP
    MUCHISKY, MM
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1993, 54 (05): : 633 - 639
  • [26] OPTIMAL SEPARATION OF CENTER-OF-MASS MOTION
    VINCENT, CM
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1973, 8 (03): : 929 - 937
  • [27] Alternate, well-founded way to treat center-of-mass correlations: Proposal of a local center-of-mass correlations potential
    Messud, Jeremie
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2013, 87 (02):
  • [28] CENTER-OF-MASS PROBLEM IN (X,XP) PROCESSES
    GUARDIOLA, R
    POLLS, A
    ANALES DE FISICA, 1976, 72 (01): : 76 - 77
  • [29] Center-of-mass alterations and visual illusion of extent
    Aleksandr Bulatov
    Algis Bertulis
    Algirdas Gutauskas
    Lina Mickiene
    Gitana Kadziene
    Biological Cybernetics, 2010, 102 : 475 - 487
  • [30] CENTER-OF-MASS MOTION AND SIEGERT THEOREM - REPLY
    MOSCONI, B
    RICCI, P
    CAMBI, A
    PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1988, 38 (06): : 2976 - 2977