Efficiency in banking: does the choice of inputs and outputs matter?

被引:4
|
作者
Floros, Christos [1 ]
Zopounidis, Constantin [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Yong [4 ]
Lemonakis, Christos [5 ]
Garefalakis, Alexandros [1 ]
Tabouratzi, Efthalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Crete, Dept Accounting & Finance, Iraklion 71004, Crete, Greece
[2] Tech Univ Crete, Financial Engn Lab, Sch Prod Engn & Management, Khania 73100, Greece
[3] Inst Finance, Audencia Business Sch, 8 Route Joneliere, F-44312 Nantes, France
[4] Univ Huddersfield Queensgate, Huddersfield Business Sch, Dept Accountancy Finance & Econ, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Technol Educ Inst Crete, Dept Business Adm, Agios Nikolaos 72100, Crete, Greece
关键词
PIGS; banking sector; efficiency; deposits dilemma; two-stage approach; cash flows; DEA; data envelopment analysis; regression; DEA; INEFFICIENCY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1504/IJCEE.2020.107370
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines banking efficiency using recent data from PIGS countries (i.e., Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain), which suffer from debt problems. We employ a two-stage approach based on the effect of several items of balance sheets on cash flows and data envelopment analysis (DEA). More specifically, we extend previous studies by giving attention to the deposit dilemma. The reported results show that the choice of inputs and outputs does matter in the case of European banking efficiency. Although the role of deposits is controversial, we find that deposits may be an output variable, owing to liquidity issues that play a major role in the efficiency of PIGS' banking sector. We also report that the DEA model with deposits as an output variable generates efficiency scores that fall between periods. These results are helpful to bank managers and financial analysts dealing with efficiency modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 148
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does the Choice of Statin Really Matter?
    Lavie, Carl J.
    Milani, Richard V.
    O'Keefe, James H.
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2010, 122 (03) : 243 - 247
  • [42] Why technology choice does matter
    Harkins, Brian
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2011, 90 (06): : 35 - +
  • [43] Does choice of mutation tool matter?
    Gopinath, Rahul
    Ahmed, Iftekhar
    Alipour, Mohammad Amin
    Jensen, Carlos
    Groce, Alex
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2017, 25 (03) : 871 - 920
  • [44] Employer of choice: does gender matter?
    Bellou, Victoria
    Rigopoulou, Irini
    Kehagias, John
    [J]. GENDER IN MANAGEMENT, 2015, 30 (08): : 613 - +
  • [45] Does the choice of QTc formula matter?
    Fujiwara, Yoshihiro
    Komatsu, Toru
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (02): : 535 - 536
  • [46] Does choice of mutation tool matter?
    Rahul Gopinath
    Iftekhar Ahmed
    Mohammad Amin Alipour
    Carlos Jensen
    Alex Groce
    [J]. Software Quality Journal, 2017, 25 : 871 - 920
  • [47] Glutamate Inputs to the Nucleus Accumbens: Does Source Matter?
    Tye, Kay M.
    [J]. NEURON, 2012, 76 (04) : 671 - 673
  • [48] Target setting in data envelopment analysis: efficiency improvement models with predefined inputs/outputs
    Ibrahim, Mustapha Daruwana
    Daneshvar, Sahand
    Guden, Huseyin
    Vizvari, Bela
    [J]. OPSEARCH, 2020, 57 (04) : 1319 - 1336
  • [49] Efficiency measures and computational approaches for data envelopment analysis models with ratio inputs and outputs
    Olesen, Ole Bent
    Petersen, Niels Christian
    Podinovski, Victor V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 261 (02) : 640 - 655
  • [50] Measuring the multi-component efficiency with shared inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis
    Jahanshahloo, GR
    Amirteimoori, AR
    Kordrostami, S
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2004, 155 (01) : 283 - 293