Medical 3D Printing Dimensional Accuracy for Multi-pathological Anatomical Models 3D Printed Using Material Extrusion

被引:13
|
作者
Ravi, Prashanth [1 ]
Chepelev, Leonid L. [2 ]
Stichweh, Gabrielle, V [3 ]
Jones, Benjamin S. [3 ]
Rybicki, Frank J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Innovat Hub Makerspace 1819, 2900 Reading Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45206 USA
关键词
Medical 3D printing; Anatomical models; Surgical planning; Material extrusion; Accuracy; Ultimaker; 3;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-022-00614-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Medical 3D printing of anatomical models is being increasingly applied in healthcare facilities. The accuracy of such 3D-printed anatomical models is an important aspect of their overall quality control. The purpose of this research was to test whether the accuracy of a variety of anatomical models 3D printed using Material Extrusion (MEX) lies within a reasonable tolerance level, defined as less than 1-mm dimensional error. Six medical models spanning across anatomical regions (musculoskeletal, neurological, abdominal, cardiovascular) and sizes (model volumes ranging from similar to 4 to 203 cc) were chosen for the primary study. Three measurement landing blocks were strategically designed within each of the six medical models to allow high-resolution caliper measurements. An 8-cc reference cube was printed as the 7th model in the primary study. In the secondary study, the effect of model rotation and scale was assessed using two of the models from the first study. All models were 3D printed using an Ultimaker 3 printer in triplicates. All absolute measurement errors were found to be less than 1 mm with a maximum error of 0.89 mm. The maximum relative error was 2.78%. The average absolute error was 0.26 mm, and the average relative error was 0.71% in the primary study, and the results were similar in the secondary study with an average absolute error of 0.30 mm and an average relative error of 0.60%. The relative errors demonstrated certain patterns in the data, which were explained based on the mechanics of MEX 3D printing. Results indicate that the MEX process, when carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis, could be suitable for the 3D printing of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning if an accuracy level of 1 mm is deemed sufficient for the application.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 622
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3D Printing Al2O3 Ceramics Using Material Extrusion
    Kadam, Anurag
    Nikolay, Dieter
    [J]. InterCeram: International Ceramic Review, 2022, 71 (04) : 30 - 37
  • [32] Multi-material 3D printed hydraulic actuator for medical robots
    Siegfarth, Marius
    Pusch, Tim Philipp
    Pfeil, Antoine
    Renaud, Pierre
    Stallkamp, Jan
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (06) : 1019 - 1026
  • [33] Accuracy of 3D printed polymers intended for models and surgical guides printed with two different 3D printers
    Johansson, Camilla
    Dibes, Jasmin
    Rodriguez, Luis Emilio Lopez
    Papia, Evaggelia
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (02) : 339 - 347
  • [34] A strategy to eliminate interbead defects and improve dimensional accuracy in material extrusion 3D printing of highly filled polymer
    Cote, Raphael
    Demers, Vincent
    Demarquette, Nicole R.
    Charlon, Sebastien
    Soulestin, Jeremie
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 68
  • [35] Tangible Organs - Introducing 3D Printed Organ Models with VR to Interact with Medical 3D Models
    Reinschluessel, Anke, V
    Muender, Thomas
    Uslar, Verena
    Weyhe, Dirk
    Schenk, Andrea
    Malaka, Rainer
    [J]. CHI EA '19 EXTENDED ABSTRACTS: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [36] A survey of design methods for material extrusion polymer 3D printing
    Huang, Jiaqi
    Chen, Qian
    Jiang, Hao
    Zou, Bin
    Li, Lei
    Liu, Jikai
    Yu, Huangchao
    [J]. VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING, 2020, 15 (02) : 148 - 162
  • [37] Material Extrusion 3D Printing of PEEK-Based Composites
    Hanemann, Thomas
    Klein, Alexander
    Baumgaertner, Siegfried
    Jung, Judith
    Wilhelm, David
    Antusch, Steffen
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [38] Material extrusion of plant biopolymers: Opportunities & challenges for 3D printing
    Chaunier, Laurent
    Guessasma, Sofiane
    Belhabib, Sofiane
    Della Valle, Guy
    Lourdin, Denis
    Leroy, Eric
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 21 : 220 - 233
  • [39] Analysis, classification and remediation of defects in material extrusion 3D printing
    Erokhin, Kirill S.
    Naumov, Sergei A.
    Ananikov, Valentine P.
    [J]. RUSSIAN CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2023, 92 (11)
  • [40] 3D printing of infrared transparent ceramics via material extrusion
    Li, Beining
    Xue, Zixiao
    Jiang, Benxue
    Feng, Tao
    Zhang, Long
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    He, Jin
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 61