Medical 3D Printing Dimensional Accuracy for Multi-pathological Anatomical Models 3D Printed Using Material Extrusion

被引:13
|
作者
Ravi, Prashanth [1 ]
Chepelev, Leonid L. [2 ]
Stichweh, Gabrielle, V [3 ]
Jones, Benjamin S. [3 ]
Rybicki, Frank J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45219 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Innovat Hub Makerspace 1819, 2900 Reading Rd, Cincinnati, OH 45206 USA
关键词
Medical 3D printing; Anatomical models; Surgical planning; Material extrusion; Accuracy; Ultimaker; 3;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-022-00614-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Medical 3D printing of anatomical models is being increasingly applied in healthcare facilities. The accuracy of such 3D-printed anatomical models is an important aspect of their overall quality control. The purpose of this research was to test whether the accuracy of a variety of anatomical models 3D printed using Material Extrusion (MEX) lies within a reasonable tolerance level, defined as less than 1-mm dimensional error. Six medical models spanning across anatomical regions (musculoskeletal, neurological, abdominal, cardiovascular) and sizes (model volumes ranging from similar to 4 to 203 cc) were chosen for the primary study. Three measurement landing blocks were strategically designed within each of the six medical models to allow high-resolution caliper measurements. An 8-cc reference cube was printed as the 7th model in the primary study. In the secondary study, the effect of model rotation and scale was assessed using two of the models from the first study. All models were 3D printed using an Ultimaker 3 printer in triplicates. All absolute measurement errors were found to be less than 1 mm with a maximum error of 0.89 mm. The maximum relative error was 2.78%. The average absolute error was 0.26 mm, and the average relative error was 0.71% in the primary study, and the results were similar in the secondary study with an average absolute error of 0.30 mm and an average relative error of 0.60%. The relative errors demonstrated certain patterns in the data, which were explained based on the mechanics of MEX 3D printing. Results indicate that the MEX process, when carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis, could be suitable for the 3D printing of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning if an accuracy level of 1 mm is deemed sufficient for the application.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 622
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medical 3D Printing Dimensional Accuracy for Multi-pathological Anatomical Models 3D Printed Using Material Extrusion
    Prashanth Ravi
    Leonid L. Chepelev
    Gabrielle V. Stichweh
    Benjamin S. Jones
    Frank J. Rybicki
    [J]. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2022, 35 : 613 - 622
  • [2] A systematic evaluation of medical 3D printing accuracy of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning manufactured in elastic and rigid material using desktop inverted vat photopolymerization
    Ravi, Prashanth
    Chepelev, Leonid
    Lawera, Nathan
    Haque, Khan Md Ariful
    Chen, Victoria C. P.
    Ali, Arafat
    Rybicki, Frank J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06) : 3223 - 3233
  • [3] Assessment of dimensional accuracy of 3D printed part using resin 3D printing technique
    Dhanunjayarao, B. N.
    Naidu, N. V. Swamy
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 59 : 1608 - 1614
  • [4] From medical imaging to 3D printed anatomical models: a low-cost, affordable 3D printing approach
    Borunda-Escudero, Gerardo E.
    Chavez-Ponce, Nadia A.
    Borunda-Escudero, Fernanda S.
    Velasco-Villasenor, Maria L.
    Castillo-Cardiel, Maria G.
    [J]. CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2024, 92 (04): : 426 - 436
  • [5] Dual-extrusion 3D printing of anatomical models for education
    Smith, Michelle L.
    Jones, James F. X.
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2018, 11 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [6] Guidelines for 3D printed springs using material extrusion
    Enea, Sacco
    Moon, Seung Ki
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (03) : 409 - 427
  • [7] Anatomical accuracy in medical 3D modeling
    Wulf, J
    Vitt, KD
    Gehl, HB
    Busch, LC
    [J]. MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 2001: OUTER SPACE, INNER SPACE, VIRTUAL SPACE, 2001, 81 : 584 - 586
  • [8] From medical imaging data to 3D printed anatomical models
    Bucking, Thore M.
    Hill, Emma R.
    Robertson, James L.
    Maneas, Efthymios
    Plumb, Andrew A.
    Nikitichev, Daniil I.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [9] Dimensional accuracy of 3D printed vertebra
    Ogden, Kent
    Ordway, Nathaniel
    Diallo, Dalanda
    Tillapaugh-Fay, Gwen
    Aslan, Can
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2014, 9036
  • [10] Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models
    George, Elizabeth
    Liacouras, Peter
    Rybicki, Frank J.
    Mitsouras, Dimitrios
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2017, 37 (05) : 1424 - 1450