Pulmonary vein imaging: comparison of 3D magnetic resonance angiography with 2D cine MRI for characterizing anatomy and size

被引:25
|
作者
Syed, MA
Peters, DC
Rashid, H
Arai, AE
机构
[1] NHLBI, Cardiac Energet Lab, US Dept HHS, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Div Cardiol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
pulmonary vein; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance angiography; atrial fibrillation;
D O I
10.1081/JCMR-200053458
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Pulmonary vein imaging is integral for planning atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. We tested the feasibility of quantifying pulmonary vein ostial diameter using two-dimensional cine cardiac magnetic resonance (2D cine CMR) and three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (3D MRA). Nine patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and 20 normal volunteers underwent 2D cine CMR and contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of pulmonary veins on a 1.5 T scanner. Pulmonary vein ostial diameters were measured and pulmonary vein vessel border sharpness was graded qualitatively. Both techniques provided excellent pulmonary vein imaging; however, 3D MRA was faster to perform. The average difference between the systolic and diastolic pulmonary vein diameter was 2.5 mm (23.2%, p < 0.0001) in normal volunteers and 2.2 mm ( 16.9%, p < 0.0001) in atrial fibrillation patients. The ostial diameter measurements by 3D MRA were significantly larger than on 2D cine CMR. Additionally, the pulmonary vein borders appeared sharper with 2D cine CMR compared to 3D MRA. In conclusion, the 2D images can resolve differences in diameter across the cardiac cycle, while the 3D images provide high quality anatomical depiction but blur borders due to pulsatile motion. We suggest a protocol combining 2D cine CMR and 3D MRA for comprehensive evaluation of pulmonary veins.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D isotropic MRI of ankle: review of literature with comparison to 2D MRI
    Suryansh Bajaj
    Avneesh Chhabra
    Atul Kumar Taneja
    Skeletal Radiology, 2024, 53 : 825 - 846
  • [22] 3D isotropic MRI of ankle: review of literature with comparison to 2D MRI
    Bajaj, Suryansh
    Chhabra, Avneesh
    Taneja, Atul Kumar
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (05) : 825 - 846
  • [23] Use of speckle tracking to quantify global LV function: A comparison with 2D and 3D echo and magnetic resonance imaging
    Brown, Joseph K.
    Marwick, Thomas H.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 403 - 404
  • [24] GUIDED 3D ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON TO 1D AND 2D ECHO AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LV MASS IN HUMANS
    KING, DL
    GOPAL, AS
    SHEN, ZQ
    KELLER, AM
    HYPERTENSION, 1993, 22 (03) : 440 - 440
  • [25] 2D AND 3D MR ANGIOGRAPHY - EVALUATION OF ANATOMY AND STENOSIS OF RENAL-ARTERY
    MASPES, F
    SQUILLACI, E
    CRECCO, M
    POCEK, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 163 - 163
  • [26] Simultaneous magnetic resonance gadolinium-enhanced 2D perfusion and 3D angiographic imaging
    Goldfarb, JW
    Prasad, PV
    Chen, Q
    Edelman, RR
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 21 (06) : 585 - 591
  • [27] Craniosynostosis: prenatal diagnosis by 2D/3D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
    Helfer, Talita Micheletti
    Peixoto, Alberto Borges
    Tonni, Gabriele
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2016, 18 (03) : 378 - 385
  • [28] Feasibility of proximal right coronary artery imaging by 2D and 3D echocardiography in comparison to coronary angiography
    Stoebe S.
    Lange K.
    Pfeiffer D.
    Hagendorff A.
    Echo Research & Practice, 2015, 2 (3): : 73 - 79
  • [29] Pulmonary sequestration: demonstration of blood supply with 2D and 3D MR angiography
    Lehnhardt, S
    Winterer, JT
    Uhrmeister, P
    Herget, G
    Laubenberger, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [30] 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma
    Vanderveen, K
    Hussain, H
    Weadock, WJ
    Adusumilli, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 90 - 90