Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm

被引:98
|
作者
Willson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Pomona, CA 91768 USA
关键词
communicative action; discourse; participation; planning theory; rationality; transport policy;
D O I
10.1023/A:1005247430522
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Communicative rationality offers a new paradigm for transportation planning. Drawing on the literature and lessons from transportation planning practice, this paper describes the characteristics of a "communicative" form of transportation planning and compares them with conventional practices. A communicative rationality paradigm would place language and discourse at the core of transportation planning. The paper argues that it would lead to greater attention to desired transportation ends (goals), better integration of means and ends, new forms of participation and learning, and enhanced deliberative capacity. The paper explains the implications of this paradigm for the role of the transportation planner, the purpose of planning, the planning process, communicative practices, problem framing, and the nature of planning analysis. The paper concludes with an assessment of communicative rationality's ability to promote more effective transportation planning. It seeks to create a dialogue that will support the investigation of new transportation planning processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Habermas' Communicative Rationality and Connectionist AI
    Higgitt, Ryan
    CULTURE THEORY AND CRITIQUE, 2011, 52 (01) : 83 - 100
  • [32] Is relativism a necessary consequence of communicative rationality?
    Vostrikova, E. V.
    EPISTEMOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-EPISTEMOLOGIYA I FILOSOFIYA NAUKI, 2008, 17 (03): : 87 - 91
  • [33] Communicative Rationality as the Liberating and Critical Episteme
    Diaz Montiel, Zulay C.
    UTOPIA Y PRAXIS LATINOAMERICANA-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE FILOSOFIA IBEROAMERICANA Y TEORIA SOCIAL, 2006, 11 (32): : 55 - 75
  • [34] Communicative rationality- external and internal
    Antonovskiy, A. Y.
    EPISTEMOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-EPISTEMOLOGIYA I FILOSOFIYA NAUKI, 2008, 17 (03): : 71 - 77
  • [35] COMMUNICATIVE RATIONALITY AS THE BASIS OF THE CRITICISM OF HABERMAS,JURGEN THEORY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTING
    HOLZER, H
    DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 1988, 36 (11): : 989 - 1002
  • [36] A SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF COOPERATIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ALGORITHMS
    Sprenger, Ralf
    Moench, Lars
    2008 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 2769 - 2776
  • [37] UNDERSTANDING LAUGHTER: A COMMUNICATIVE PARADIGM
    Chernikov, Mikhail
    Perevozchikova, Larisa
    Avdeenko, Evgenia
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (INTCESS 2020), 2020, : 69 - 74
  • [38] ACQUIESCENCE OR COMMUNICATIVE RATIONALITY - RESCHER CRITIQUE OF HABERMAS
    WUSTEHUBE, A
    DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 1994, 42 (02): : 327 - 334
  • [39] A change of basic paradigms: The concept of communicative rationality
    Nugaev, RM
    VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 2001, (01) : 114 - 122
  • [40] Communicative versus Strategic Rationality: Habermas Theory of Communicative Action and the Social Brain
    Schaefer, Michael
    Heinze, Hans-Jochen
    Rotte, Michael
    Denke, Claudia
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):