Referrals for second opinion in surgical pathology: implications for management of cancer patients in the UK

被引:27
|
作者
Cook, IS [1 ]
McCormick, D [1 ]
Poller, DN [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2001年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词
pathology; referral; diagnosis; misdiagnosis; cost; treatment; delay;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.2001.1150
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare patterns of outgoing referral practice from one large district general hospital histopathology (cellular pathology) laboratory to other pathology laboratories. Design: Referral cases for the relevant years were identified via hand searching of consultant referral files and from a central laboratory referral file. A comparison was made of the number and nature of pathology case referrals made to other laboratories in year 1990 with those made in year 1998. Setting: Large district general hospital pathology laboratory in the UK. Results: A statistically significant increase in the number of cases referred for a second opinion to an outside pathologist was noted, from 60 to 128 cases, representing an increase from 0.35 to 0.56% of total laboratory specimen workload (P = 0.0034). In 36 (31.0%) of 116 cases from 1998 the diagnosis was altered, or a confident diagnosis was made where previously there was no definite diagnosis.' Five cases with a benign in-house diagnosis had a malignant second opinion diagnosis and five cases with a malignant in-house diagnosis had a benign second opinion diagnosis. The largest single category of referred cases was for classification/grading of malignant lymphoma, comprising 27 (23%) of cases. The mean time delay between receipt of a specimen in the laboratory and issuing of the final report was 22 days (range 7-60 days). Only 25% of the referred cases were reported within 14 days. Conclusions: Referrals are an important component of pathology practice. In the UK much of this activity is performed on a 'grace and favour' basis between laboratories despite the fact that referral cases are often complex and time consuming for the recipient pathologist and laboratory. Histopathology referrals do not seem to be adequately costed and accounted for in interinstitutional service level agreements within the UK National Health Service. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 594
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Second opinion and discrepancy in the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions at surgical pathology
    Sharif, Muhammad Ashraf
    Hamdani, Syed Naeem Raza
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 53 (03) : 460 - 464
  • [22] Changes in Breast Cancer Reports after Pathology Second Opinion
    Marco, Vicente
    Muntal, Teresa
    Garcia-Hernandez, Felip
    Cortes, Javier
    Gonzalez, Begona
    Rubio, Isabel T.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (03): : 295 - 301
  • [23] Changes in Breast Cancer Reports after Pathology Second Opinion
    Marco Molina, V.
    Muntal, T.
    Cortes, J.
    Gonzalez, B.
    Rubio, I.
    Garcia Hernandez, F.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 56A - 56A
  • [24] A survey of surgical management of the axilla in UK breast cancer patients
    Gaston, MS
    Dixon, JM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (11) : 1738 - 1742
  • [25] Changes in Breast Cancer Reports after Pathology Second Opinion
    Marco Molina, V.
    Muntal, T.
    Cortes, J.
    Gonzalez, B.
    Rubio, I.
    Garcia Hernandez, F.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 56A - 56A
  • [26] Change in Management Based on Pathologic Second Opinion Among Bladder Cancer Patients Presenting to a Comprehensive Cancer Center: Implications for Clinical Practice
    Luchey, Adam M.
    Manimala, Neil J.
    Dickinson, Shohreh
    Dhillon, Jasreman
    Agarwal, Gautum
    Lockhart, Jorge L.
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    Sexton, Wade J.
    Pow-Sang, Julio M.
    Gilbert, Scott M.
    Poch, Michael A.
    UROLOGY, 2016, 93 : 130 - 134
  • [27] Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital - Author reply
    Tomaszewski, JE
    LiVolsi, VA
    CANCER, 2000, 89 (01) : 226 - 226
  • [28] Second opinion pathology in tertiary care of patients with urologic malignancies
    Wayment, Robert O.
    Bourne, Andrew
    Kay, Paul
    Tarter, Thomas H.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (02) : 194 - 198
  • [29] Cancer patients seeking a second surgical opinion: Results of a study on motives, needs, and expectations
    Mellink, WAM
    Von Dulmen, AM
    Wiggers, T
    Spreeuwenberg, PMM
    Eggermont, AMM
    Bensing, JM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (08) : 1492 - 1497
  • [30] A further survey of surgical management of the axilla in UK breast cancer patients
    Glynn, Ronan W.
    Williams, Linda
    Dixon, J. Michael
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (06) : 506 - 511