Referrals for second opinion in surgical pathology: implications for management of cancer patients in the UK

被引:27
|
作者
Cook, IS [1 ]
McCormick, D [1 ]
Poller, DN [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2001年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词
pathology; referral; diagnosis; misdiagnosis; cost; treatment; delay;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.2001.1150
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare patterns of outgoing referral practice from one large district general hospital histopathology (cellular pathology) laboratory to other pathology laboratories. Design: Referral cases for the relevant years were identified via hand searching of consultant referral files and from a central laboratory referral file. A comparison was made of the number and nature of pathology case referrals made to other laboratories in year 1990 with those made in year 1998. Setting: Large district general hospital pathology laboratory in the UK. Results: A statistically significant increase in the number of cases referred for a second opinion to an outside pathologist was noted, from 60 to 128 cases, representing an increase from 0.35 to 0.56% of total laboratory specimen workload (P = 0.0034). In 36 (31.0%) of 116 cases from 1998 the diagnosis was altered, or a confident diagnosis was made where previously there was no definite diagnosis.' Five cases with a benign in-house diagnosis had a malignant second opinion diagnosis and five cases with a malignant in-house diagnosis had a benign second opinion diagnosis. The largest single category of referred cases was for classification/grading of malignant lymphoma, comprising 27 (23%) of cases. The mean time delay between receipt of a specimen in the laboratory and issuing of the final report was 22 days (range 7-60 days). Only 25% of the referred cases were reported within 14 days. Conclusions: Referrals are an important component of pathology practice. In the UK much of this activity is performed on a 'grace and favour' basis between laboratories despite the fact that referral cases are often complex and time consuming for the recipient pathologist and laboratory. Histopathology referrals do not seem to be adequately costed and accounted for in interinstitutional service level agreements within the UK National Health Service. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 594
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Importance of a second opinion in breast surgical pathology and therapeutic implications
    Salles, Marcio de Almeida
    Fernandes Sanches, Fernanda Squarcio
    Perez, Amanda Arantes
    Gobbi, Helenice
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2008, 30 (12): : 602 - 608
  • [2] Impact in the Management of Patients After Pathology Second Opinion in Breast Cancer
    Marco, V.
    Muntal, T.
    Cortes, J.
    Gonzalez, B.
    Rubio, I. T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S91 - S91
  • [3] IMPACT OF SECOND OPINION PATHOLOGY REVIEW IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER
    Borza, Tudor
    Eberly, Ashleigh
    Wood, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E398 - E398
  • [4] Second opinion oral pathology referrals in New Zealand
    Seo, B.
    Hussaini, H. M.
    Rich, A. M.
    PATHOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [5] Importance of the Second Opinion in Surgical Breast Pathology and Its Therapeutic Implications
    Ibarra, A.
    Baksai, K.
    Vial, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 154 : S116 - S117
  • [6] Surgical Second Opinion for Pancreatic Cancer Patients
    Quinn, Patrick L.
    Nikahd, Melica
    Saiyed, Shah
    Heifetz, Addie
    Bath, Natalie M.
    Hyer, J. Madison
    Cloyd, Jordan M.
    Jain, Shikha
    Ejaz, Aslam
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2025, 240 (03) : 270 - 278
  • [7] Second Opinion Expert Pathology in Endometrial Cancer Potential Clinical Implications
    Grevenkamp, Friederike
    Kommoss, Felix
    Kommoss, Friedrich
    Lax, Sigurd
    Fend, Falko
    Wallwiener, Diethelm
    Schoenfisch, Birgitt
    Kraemer, Bernhard
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Taran, Florin-Andrei
    Staebler, Annette
    Kommoss, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [8] Second Opinion Expert Pathology Review in Bladder Cancer: Implications for Patient Care
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    Collingwood, Robin
    Lai, Win Shun
    Pena, Maria Del Carmen Rodriquez
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 26 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [9] Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma
    Coblentz, TR
    Mills, SE
    Theodorescu, D
    CANCER, 2001, 91 (07) : 1284 - 1290
  • [10] Clinical and Financial Implications of Second-Opinion Surgical Pathology Review: Experience of a Comprehensive Cancer Center With Regional Affiliates
    Johnson, Steven M.
    Samulski, Teresa D.
    O'Connor, Siobhan M.
    Smith, Scott, V
    Funkhouser, William K.
    Broaddus, Russell R.
    Calhoun, Benjamin C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 (04) : 559 - 568