The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer

被引:182
|
作者
Watson, M [1 ]
Lloyd, S [1 ]
Davidson, J [1 ]
Meyer, L [1 ]
Eeles, R [1 ]
Ebbs, S [1 ]
Murday, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6690139
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The present study investigated: (1) perception of genetic risk and, (2) the psychological effects of genetic counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. Using a prospective design, with assessment pre- and post-genetic counselling at clinics and by postal follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months, attenders at four South London genetic clinics were assessed. Participants included 282 women with a family history of breast cancer. Outcome was measured in terms of mental hearth, cancer-specific distress and risk perception. High revels of cancer-specific distress were found pre-genetic counselling, with 28% of participants reporting that they worried about breast cancer 'frequently or constantly' and 18% that worry about breast cancer was 'a severe or definite problem'. Following genetic counselling, revels of cancer-specific distress were unchanged. General mental health remained unchanged over time (33% psychiatric cases detected pre-genetic counselling, 27% at 12 months after genetic counselling). Prior to their genetics consultation, participants showed poor knowledge of their lifetime risk of breast cancer since there was no association between their perceived lifetime risk (when they were asked to express this as a 1 in x odds ratio) and their actual risk, when the latter was calculated by the geneticist at the clinic using the CASH model. In contrast, women were more accurate about their risk of breast cancer pre-genetic counselling when this was assessed in broad categorical terms (i.e. very much lower/very much higher than the average woman) with a significant association between this rating and the subsequently calculated CASH risk figure (P = 0.001), Genetic counselling produced a modest shift in the accuracy of perceived lifetime risk, expressed as an odds ratio, which was maintained at 12 months' follow-up. A significant minority failed to benefit from genetic counselling; 77 women continued to over-estimate their risk and maintain high levels of cancer-related worry. Most clinic attenders were inaccurate in their estimates of the population risk of breast cancer with only 24% able to give the correct figure prior to genetic counselling and 36% over-estimating this risk. There was some improvement following genetic counselling with 62% able to give the correct figure, but this information was poorly retained and this figure had dropped to 34% by the 1-year follow-up. The study showed that women attending for genetic counselling are worried about breast cancer, with 34% indicating that they had initiated the referral to the genetic clinic themselves. This anxiety is not alleviated by genetic counselling, although women reported that it was less of a problem at follow-up. Women who continue to over-estimate their risk and worry about breast cancer are likely to go on seeking unnecessary screening if they are not reassured.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 874
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer
    Eccles, DM
    Evens, DGR
    Mackay, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 37 (03) : 203 - 209
  • [32] Perception of breast cancer risk and surveillance behaviours of women with family history of breast cancer:: A brief report on a Spanish cohort
    Gil, F
    Méndez, I
    Sirgo, A
    Llort, G
    Blanco, I
    Cortés-Funes, H
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) : 821 - 827
  • [33] Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires—an Italian exploratory study
    Chiara Catania
    Irene Feroce
    Monica Barile
    Aron Goldhirsch
    Tommaso De Pas
    Filippo de Braud
    Sabrina Boselli
    Laura Adamoli
    Davide Radice
    Alessandra Rossi
    Gianluca Spitaleri
    Cristina Noberasco
    Bernardo Bonanni
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2016, 142 : 633 - 648
  • [34] Mixed method systematic review: the relationship between breast cancer risk perception and health-protective behaviour in women with family history of breast cancer
    Paalosalo-Harris, Kati
    Skirton, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (04) : 760 - 774
  • [35] Psychological impact of genetic counselling and testing in women previously diagnosed with breast cancer
    Randall, J
    Butow, P
    Kirk, J
    Tucker, K
    [J]. INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 31 (07) : 397 - 405
  • [36] The impact of reproductive life on breast cancer risk in women with family history or BRCA mutation
    Toss, Angela
    Grandi, Giovanni
    Cagnacci, Angelo
    Marcheselli, Luigi
    Pavesi, Silvia
    De Matteis, Elisabetta
    Razzaboni, Elisabetta
    Tomasello, Chiara
    Cascinu, Stefano
    Cortesi, Laura
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (06) : 9144 - 9154
  • [37] Oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer
    Aslam, F
    Rashid, H
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (01): : 39 - 39
  • [38] Genetic risk counselling for breast cancer families
    Hopwood, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (10) : 1477 - 1479
  • [39] Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer
    Burke, W
    Culver, JO
    Bowen, D
    Lowry, D
    Durfy, S
    McTiernan, A
    Andersen, MR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 90 (05): : 361 - 368
  • [40] Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: Correlation with age and family history of breast cancer
    Smith, BL
    Gadd, MA
    Lawler, C
    MacDonald, DJ
    Grudberg, SC
    Chi, FS
    Carlson, K
    Comegno, A
    Souba, WW
    [J]. SURGERY, 1996, 120 (02) : 297 - 303