A radiologic diagnostic scoring model based on CT features for differentiating gastric schwannoma from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

被引:4
|
作者
Xu, Jian-Xia [1 ]
Yu, Jie-Ni [2 ]
Wang, Xiao-Jie [2 ]
Xiong, Yan-Xi [3 ]
Lu, Yuan-Fei [2 ]
Zhou, Jia-Ping [2 ]
Zhou, Qiao-Mei [2 ]
Yang, Xiao-Yan [2 ]
Shi, Dan [2 ]
Huang, Xiao-Shan [1 ]
Fan, Shu-Feng [1 ]
Yu, Ri-Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, 318 Chao Wang Rd, Hangzhou 310005, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, 88 Jie Fang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Med, Renmin Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shiyan 442000, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH | 2022年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
Gastric schwannoma; gastrointestinal stromal tumors; scoring model; contrast-enhanced CT; gastric neoplasms; STOMACH; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to further explore the CT features of gastric schwannoma (GS), propose and validate a convenient diagnostic scoring system to distinguish GS from gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) preoperatively. 170 patients with submucosal tumors pathologically confirmed (GS n=35; gastric GISTs n=135) from Hospital 1 were analyzed retrospectively as the training cohort, and 72 patients (GS=11; gastric GISTs=61) from Hospital 2 were enrolled as the validation cohort. We searched for significant CT imaging characteristics and constructed the scoring system via binary logistic regression and converted regression coefficients to weighted scores. The ROC curves, AUCs and calibration tests were carried out to evaluate the scoring models in both the training cohort and the validation cohort. For convenient assessment, the system was further divided into four score ranges and their diagnostic probability of GS was calculated respectively. Four CT imaging characteristics were ultimately enrolled in this scoring system, including transverse position (2 points), location (5 points), perilesional lymph nodes (6 points) and pattern of enhancement (2 points). The AUC of the scoring model in the training cohort were 0.873 (95% CI, 0.816-0.929) and the cutoff point was 6 points. In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.898 (95% CI, 0.804-0.957) and the cutoff value was 5 points. Four score ranges were as follows: 0-3 points for very low probability of GS, 4-7 points for low probability; 8-9 points for middle probability; 10-15 points for very high probability. A convenient scoring model to preoperatively discriminate GS from gastric GISTs was finally proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 314
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictive Factors for Differentiating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors from Leiomyomas Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Findings in Patients with Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Kim, Sun Moon
    Kim, Eun Young
    Cho, Jin Woong
    Jeon, Seong Woo
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Tae Hyeon
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    Kim, Jin-Oh
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 54 (06) : 872 - 880
  • [32] A CT-based nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors preoperatively
    Chang Li
    Wenhao Fu
    Li Huang
    Yingqian Chen
    Pei Xiang
    Jian Guan
    Canhui Sun
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 3075 - 3085
  • [33] A CT-based nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors preoperatively
    Li, Chang
    Fu, Wenhao
    Huang, Li
    Chen, Yingqian
    Xiang, Pei
    Guan, Jian
    Sun, Canhui
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (07) : 3075 - 3085
  • [34] Endosonographic Features of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): Is It Possible to Differentiate GISTS from Leiomyomas By EUS?
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Kim, Dong Uk
    Song, Geun-Am
    Heo, Jeong
    Kim, Kyung Yeob
    Choi, Seongho H.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB237 - AB237
  • [35] Identification of gastric schwannoma and non-metastatic gastric stromal tumor by CT: a single-institution retrospective diagnostic test
    Gu, Xiaolong
    Li, Yang
    Shi, Gaofeng
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (02) : 922 - 931
  • [36] Differentiating gastric schwannoma from gastric stromal tumor (≤5 cm) by histogram analysis based on iodine-based material decomposition images: a preliminary study
    Wang, Gang
    Liu, Xianwang
    Zhou, Junlin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [37] Immunohistochemical and genetic features of gastric and metastatic liver gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Sequential analyses
    Kikuchi, H
    Yamashita, K
    Kawabata, T
    Yamamoto, M
    Hiramatsu, Y
    Kondo, K
    Baba, M
    Ohta, M
    Kamiya, K
    Tanaka, T
    Suzuki, S
    Kitagawa, K
    Kitagawa, M
    Sugimura, H
    Konno, H
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2006, 97 (02): : 127 - 132
  • [38] Gastric Stromal Tumors in Carney Triad Are Different Clinically, Pathologically, and Behaviorally From Sporadic Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Findings in 104 Cases
    Zhang, Lizhi
    Smyrk, Thomas C.
    Young, William F., Jr.
    Stratakis, Constantine A.
    Carney, J. Aidan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 34 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [39] CT Features of Colorectal Schwannomas: Differentiation from Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    Kang, Ji Hee
    Kim, Se Hyung
    Kim, Young Hoon
    Rha, Sung Eun
    Hur, Bo Yun
    Han, Joon Koo
    PLoS One, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [40] Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
    Cui Zhang
    Jian Wang
    Yang Yang
    Bailing Dai
    Zhihua Xu
    Fangmei Zhu
    Huajun Yu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 23