Study of Validity and Reliability of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire in Turkish Community Sample

被引:3
|
作者
Balaban, Gulsah [1 ]
Bilge, Yusuf [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim Univ, Grad Educ Inst, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
关键词
Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire; Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory; BIS; BAS; fight/flight/freeze system; BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION SYSTEM; PERSONALITY; ANXIETY; PUNISHMENT; ACTIVATION; REWARD;
D O I
10.29399/npa.27369
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: In this study, it is aimed to assess the validity and reliability of Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ) which was developed on the basis of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST) in Turkish community sample. Methods: The sample of study was consisted of 528 participants, 314 (59.5%) female and 214 (40.5%) male, in the range of 18-69 years. Data was collected by using online data collection tools via snowball method. Within the scope of the reliability study, test-retest application, split-half method and internal consistency analysis; within the scope of the validity study, explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. For criterion-related validity Behavioral Inhibition System / Behavioral Activation System Scale (BIS/BAS), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Abbreviated Form (EPQR-A) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-II) were applied. Results: At the result of reliability analysis, the Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient values of RSQ subscales were determined between 0.71 and 0.82. At the result of criterion-related validity, statistically significant correlations between subscales of RSQ and the similar subscales of BIS/BAS, EPQR-A and STAI-11 were found. In explanatory factor analysis, a five-factor construct that has eigenvalues above], accounting for 49.96% of the total variance was found and it was seen that the questionnaire items loaded on their expected subscales consistent with the original questionnaire. In confirmatory factor analysis, CFI value was below the acceptable value of 0.90 at the first analysis. After eliminating two items and applying the recommended modifications, the fit indices reached the acceptable levels. Conclusion: According to the results of analysis, it was determined that Turkish version of RSQ is a valid and reliable evaluation tool for Turkish population.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Turkish adaptation of Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire: the study of reliability and validity
    Vatan, Sevginar
    Oruclular Kahya, Yasemin
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 19 (02): : 192 - 201
  • [32] Turkish version of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire: Adaptation study
    Sozer, Omer Taha
    Sener, Gamze
    Dereboy, Cigdem
    DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 35 (02): : 76 - 85
  • [33] Validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Vaginal Penetration Cognition Questionnaire in a sample of women with vaginismus and dyspareunia
    Dogan, Sultan
    Varol-Saracoglu, Gamze
    Erbek, Evrim
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 : 1 - 9
  • [34] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Daily Experiences Questionnaire (Turkish DEQ)
    Balkaya, Nevin Akdolun
    Bektas, Murat
    Cayan, Asli
    PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (01): : 7 - 17
  • [35] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of breathlessness beliefs questionnaire
    Gurses, Hulya Nilgun
    Saka, Seda
    Zeren, Melih
    Bayram, Mehmet
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 39 (04) : 834 - 839
  • [36] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma
    cakmak, Aslihan
    Simsek, Senem
    Ince, Deniz Inal
    Saglam, Melda
    Kutukcue, Ebru Calik
    Yagli, Naciye Vardar
    Karakaya, Guel
    THORACIC RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 24 (04) : 194 - 201
  • [37] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE AUTOMATIC THOUGHTS QUESTIONNAIRE
    SAHIN, NH
    SAHIN, N
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 48 (03) : 334 - 340
  • [38] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of clinical stress questionnaire
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Acaroglu, Rengin
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2008, 28 (06) : 737 - 743
  • [39] Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Smartphone Overuse Screening Questionnaire
    Kuru, Tacettin
    Uymaz, Pelin
    Comertoglu, Seher
    Celenk, Sinem
    ADDICTA-THE TURKISH JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2022, 9 (03): : 320 - 327
  • [40] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the morningness - Eveningness questionnaire
    Ozdalyan, Firat
    Tutuncu, Ozkan
    Gumus, Hikmet
    Acikgoz, Osman
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (01): : 50 - 59