Comparative study on life cycle assessment of components produced by additive and conventional manufacturing process

被引:8
|
作者
Swetha, R. [1 ]
Krishna, L. Siva Rama [1 ]
Kiran, B. Hari Sai [1 ]
Reddy, P. Ravinder [2 ]
Venkatesh, Sriram [1 ]
机构
[1] Osmania Univ, Univ Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India
[2] Chaitanya Bharati Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Hyderabad 500075, Telangana, India
关键词
Additive Manufacturing; Conventional Manufacturing; Selective Laser Melting; Life Cycle Assessment; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.840
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sustainable manufacturing aims to create products by minimizing negative impacts on the environment. It focuses on meeting the demands of present without depleting resources of succeeding generations. As a result, it is necessary to investigate the environmental impact of the production process. The goal of this research is to evaluate the environmental impact of Additive Manufacturing (AM) and Conventional Manufacturing (CM) methods for sustainable manufacturing. Two case studies are considered for comparison i.e., Sprocket Adapter used in eBike and Tie rod used in Ackermann Steering Assembly. In both the cases, components are manufactured with Conventional process and compared with simulated results of Selective Laser Melting (SLM) AM process. Emphasis has been made to compare the Cycle time, Material consumption, Energy consumption of CM without Topology Optimization (TO), AM without Topology Optimization and AM with Topology Optimization. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is conducted for the components using SimaPro LCA Software. Results show that AM without Topology optimization has less environmental impacts compared to the other two processes. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4332 / 4340
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life Cycle Assessment of Tyre Manufacturing Process
    Shanbag, Amit
    Manjare, Sampatrao
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2020, 8 (01): : 22 - 34
  • [22] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of SLS and mFFF Additive Manufacturing Techniques for the Production of a Metal Specimen
    Presciutti, Andrea
    Gebennini, Elisa
    Liberti, Federica
    Nanni, Francesca
    Bragaglia, Mario
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [23] Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Additive Manufacturing Technologies of Aluminum Components
    Sasaki, Takafumi
    Tokimatsu, Koji
    Kajikawa, Yuya
    Funtai Oyobi Fummatsu Yakin/Journal of the Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy, 2024, 71 (12): : 649 - 659
  • [24] Current options in the life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing products
    Vytisk, Jan
    Koci, Vladimir
    Honus, Stanislav
    Vrtek, Mojmir
    OPEN ENGINEERING, 2019, 9 (01): : 674 - 682
  • [25] A Social Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Additive Manufacturing Products
    Naghshineh, Bardia
    Lourenco, Francisco
    Godina, Radu
    Jacinto, Celeste
    Carvalho, Helena
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (13):
  • [26] A Comparative Investigation of the Reliability of Biodegradable Components Produced through Additive Manufacturing Technology
    ElHassan, Amged
    Ahmed, Waleed
    Zaneldin, Essam
    POLYMERS, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [27] A CO2 EMISSIONS LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF ADDITIVE AND CONVENTIONAL MANUFACTURING BASED LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN IN THE AUTOMOTIVE
    Dalpadulo, Enrico
    Pini, Fabio
    Leali, Francesco
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 2, 2023,
  • [28] Life Cycle Assessment of Plywood Manufacturing Process in China
    Jia, Liangliang
    Chu, Jie
    Ma, Li
    Qi, Xuemin
    Kumar, Anuj
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (11)
  • [29] Comparative Studies of the Properties of Copper Components: Conventional vs. Additive Manufacturing Technologies
    Malec, Witold
    Kulasa, Joanna
    Brudny, Anna
    Hury, Anna
    Adamczyk, Bartlomiej
    Rzepecki, Ryszard
    Sekula, Robert
    Kmita, Grzegorz
    Rybak, Andrzej
    METALS, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [30] Additive vs. Conventional Manufacturing of Metal Components: Selection of the Manufacturing Process Using the AHP Method
    Schuhmann, Dirk
    Rupp, Mario
    Merkel, Markus
    Harrison, David K.
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (08)