This article examines the impact on shareholder voting of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)'s mutual fund voting disclosure rule, using a paired sample of management proposals on executive equity incentive compensation plans submitted before and after the rule change. In enacting the rule, the SEC intended to increase funds' engagement in corporate governance. While voting support for management has decreased over time, we find no evidence that mutual funds' support for management declined after the rule change, as expected by the SEC and advocates of disclosure. In fact, we find evidence of increased support for management by mutual funds after the change. (JEL K22, G34, G28, G38)
机构:
Queens Univ, Smith Sch Business, 143 Union St W, Kingston, ON K7L 2P3, CanadaQueens Univ, Smith Sch Business, 143 Union St W, Kingston, ON K7L 2P3, Canada
Calluzzo, Paul
Kedia, Simi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Rutgers Business Sch, 100 Rockafeller Rd, Piscataway Township, NJ 08854 USAQueens Univ, Smith Sch Business, 143 Union St W, Kingston, ON K7L 2P3, Canada
机构:
Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Business Management, ZA-7602 Matieland, South AfricaUniv Stellenbosch, Dept Business Management, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
Viviers, S.
Smit, E. vdM.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Stellenbosch, Sch Business, ZA-7535 Bellville, South AfricaUniv Stellenbosch, Dept Business Management, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa