Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study

被引:11
|
作者
Shindo, Ryosuke [1 ,5 ]
Aoki, Shigeru [1 ]
Yonemoto, Naohiro [2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
Yamamoto, Yuriko [1 ]
Kasai, Junko [1 ]
Kasai, Michi [1 ]
Miyagi, Etsuko [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Perinatal Ctr Matern & Neonate, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Yokohama City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Yokosuka Kyosai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
[6] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Kyoto Univ, Fac Med, Kyoto, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 12期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UMBILICAL-CORD PROLAPSE; TRANSCERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER; JAPAN; DINOPROSTONE; METAANALYSIS; RISK; GEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0189665
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of hygroscopic dilators and balloon catheters for ripening of the cervix in induction of labor. Study design This retrospective, observational study used data from the Successive Pregnancy Birth Registry System of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2012 to 2014. Nulliparous women in whom labor was induced by mechanical methods of cervical ripening at term were enrolled. The eligible women were divided into dilator, balloon <40 mL, balloon. 40 mL, and overlapping groups. Results The groups included 4645, 4100, 6615, and 1992 women, respectively. In the overlapping group, which included the women in whom delivery was most difficult, the vaginal delivery rate was lower and the intrauterine infection and neonatal mortality rates were higher than those in the dilator group. No difference in the vaginal delivery rate was observed among the dilator, balloon <40 mL, and balloon. 40 mL groups (74.6%, 72.3%, and 73.8%, respectively; p>0.05). The vaginal instrumental delivery rate was higher in the two-balloon groups than in the dilator group. The volume of intrapartum hemorrhage was lowest in the dilator group. No significant difference in the frequencies of uterine rupture and intrauterine infection were observed among the dilator and two-balloon groups. With regard to neonatal outcomes, the frequency of a low Apgar score was statistically significantly lower in the dilator group than in the two-balloon groups. Moreover, the frequency of neonatal death tended to be lower in the dilator group than in the two-balloon groups. Conclusion With regard to cervical ripening for labor induction in nulliparous women at term, the vaginal delivery rate on using a dilator and on using a balloon seems to be equivalent. Concerning maternal complications and neonatal outcomes, cervical ripening with hygroscopic dilators in labor induction might be safer.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE USE OF FOLEYS CATHETER IN RIPENING THE UNFAVORABLE CERVIX PRIOR TO INDUCTION OF LABOR
    EZIMOKHAI, M
    NWABINELI, JN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (04): : 281 - 286
  • [22] Induction of labor and cesarean birth in lower-risk nulliparous women at term: A retrospective cohort study
    Butler, Sarah E.
    Wallace, Euan M.
    Bisits, Andrew
    Selvaratnam, Roshan J.
    Davey, Mary-Ann
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (03): : 521 - 529
  • [23] Induction of labor in high-risk nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix
    Carletti, Valerio
    Yacoub, Veronica
    Valensise, Herbert C.
    Maneschi, Francesco
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024,
  • [24] Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2
    Yossi Mizrachi
    Michal Levy
    Jacob Bar
    Michal Kovo
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 294 : 725 - 730
  • [25] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Du, Chuying
    Liu, Yukun
    Liu, Yinglin
    Ding, Hong
    Zhang, Rui
    Tan, Jianping
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (06) : 1221 - 1227
  • [26] Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Levy, Michal
    Bar, Jacob
    Kovo, Michal
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 294 (04) : 725 - 730
  • [27] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Chuying Du
    Yukun Liu
    Yinglin Liu
    Hong Ding
    Rui Zhang
    Jianping Tan
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 1221 - 1227
  • [28] Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review
    Greenberg, Victoria
    Khalifeh, Adeeb
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 441 - 443
  • [29] NONPHARMACEUTICAL RIPENING OF THE UNFAVORABLE CERVIX AND INDUCTION OF LABOR BY A NOVEL DOUBLE BALLOON DEVICE
    BLUMENTHAL, PD
    GAFFIKIN, L
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 77 (06): : 967 - 968
  • [30] NONPHARMACEUTICAL RIPENING OF THE UNFAVORABLE CERVIX AND INDUCTION OF LABOR BY A NOVEL DOUBLE BALLOON DEVICE
    ATAD, J
    BORNSTEIN, J
    CALDERON, I
    PETRIKOVSKY, BM
    SOROKIN, Y
    ABRAMOVICI, H
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 77 (01): : 146 - 152