Life cycle assessment of animal-based foods and plant-based protein-rich alternatives: a socio-economic perspective

被引:22
|
作者
Varela-Ortega, Consuelo [1 ,2 ]
Blanco-Gutierrez, Irene [1 ,2 ]
Manners, Rhys [3 ]
Detzel, Andreas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Agr Econ Stat & Business Management, ETSIAAB, Campus Ciudad Univ,Av Puerta Hierro 2-4, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, CEIGRAM, Madrid, Spain
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, Kigali, Rwanda
[4] Inst Energie & Umweltforsch Heidelberg IFEU, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
protein transition; innovation; plant-based meat substitutes; social life cycle assessment; sustainability; MEAT CONSUMPTION; SUSTAINABILITY; HEALTH; FUTURE; CHALLENGES; NUTRITION; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.11655
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant-based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio-economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses the socio-economic performance of innovative legume-based food prototypes, developed in the Protein2Food research project, and conventional animal-based products (chicken meat and dairy milk). We implement a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) to quantify and compare their potential socio-economic impacts along the entire life cycle. RESULTS Findings from this analysis show that legume-based prototypes and their respective animal-based counterparts have, overall, a comparable socio-economic performance. Looking at the disaggregated life cycle stages, socio-economic hotspots (points of most negative impacts) were mainly identified at the production stage in legume-based products. Farm-level net margin and profitability are low when compared with their animal equivalents. However, at the processing stage, there are socio-economic gains for plant-based products regarding lower unemployment rates. Finally, at the consumption stage, there are mixed results. Plant-based products show worse protein affordability but better nutritional contents (lower saturated fat and cholesterol) than their animal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS To improve socio-economic performance of legume-based foods, greater emphasis should be placed upon developing improved processing technologies and supply chains. This would broaden the supply of sustainable protein-rich food options and make these products more economically attractive. The research illustrates that policies should be targeted to the different stages of the food value chain to optimize the development of innovative plant-based foods. (c) 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:5111 / 5120
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Plant-based and cell-based animal product alternatives: An assessment and agenda for food tech justice
    Broad, Garrett M.
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2019, 107 : 223 - 226
  • [32] The Isocaloric Substitution of Plant-Based and Animal-Based Protein in Relation to Aging-Related Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Zheng, Jiali
    Zhu, Tianren
    Yang, Guanghuan
    Zhao, Longgang
    Li, Fangyu
    Park, Yong-Moon
    Tabung, Fred K.
    Steck, Susan E.
    Li, Xiaoguang
    Wang, Hui
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [33] Product-group-specific nutrient index as a nutritional functional unit for the Life Cycle Assessment of protein-rich foods
    Venla Kyttä
    Anna Kårlund
    Tiina Pellinen
    Oona Pietiläinen
    Hanna L. Tuomisto
    Marjukka Kolehmainen
    Anne-Maria Pajari
    Merja Saarinen
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 1672 - 1688
  • [34] Product-group-specific nutrient index as a nutritional functional unit for the Life Cycle Assessment of protein-rich foods
    Kyttae, Venla
    Karlund, Anna
    Pellinen, Tiina
    Pietilainen, Oona
    Tuomisto, Hanna L.
    Kolehmainen, Marjukka
    Pajari, Anne-Maria
    Saarinen, Merja
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (12): : 1672 - 1688
  • [35] Determinants of real-life behavioural interventions to stimulate more plant-based and less animal-based diets: A systematic review
    Taufik, Danny
    Verain, Muriel C. D.
    Bouwman, Emily P.
    Reinders, Machiel J.
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 93 : 281 - 303
  • [36] Protein-stabilized interfaces in multiphase food: comparing structure-function relations of plant-based and animal-based proteins
    Sagis, Leonard M. C.
    Yang, Jack
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2022, 43 : 53 - 60
  • [37] Substitution of animal-based with plant-based foods on cardiometabolic health and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Manuela Neuenschwander
    Julia Stadelmaier
    Julian Eble
    Kathrin Grummich
    Edyta Szczerba
    Eva Kiesswetter
    Sabrina Schlesinger
    Lukas Schwingshackl
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 21
  • [38] Substitution of animal-based with plant-based foods on cardiometabolic health and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Neuenschwander, Manuela
    Stadelmaier, Julia
    Eble, Julian
    Grummich, Kathrin
    Szczerba, Edyta
    Kiesswetter, Eva
    Schlesinger, Sabrina
    Schwingshackl, Lukas
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [39] Managing protein-energy wasting in hemodialysis patients: A comparison of animal- and plant-based protein foods
    St-Jules, David E.
    Goldfarb, David S.
    Popp, Collin J.
    Pompeii, Mary Lou
    Liebman, Scott E.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2019, 32 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [40] Nutritional implications of Australians switching from traditional animal-source foods to plant-based 'alternatives': an exploratory study
    Huang, H.
    Johnson, B. J.
    Wycherley, T. P.
    Lawrence, A. S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2023, 82 (OCE2)