Life cycle assessment of animal-based foods and plant-based protein-rich alternatives: a socio-economic perspective

被引:22
|
作者
Varela-Ortega, Consuelo [1 ,2 ]
Blanco-Gutierrez, Irene [1 ,2 ]
Manners, Rhys [3 ]
Detzel, Andreas [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Agr Econ Stat & Business Management, ETSIAAB, Campus Ciudad Univ,Av Puerta Hierro 2-4, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, CEIGRAM, Madrid, Spain
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr IITA, Kigali, Rwanda
[4] Inst Energie & Umweltforsch Heidelberg IFEU, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
protein transition; innovation; plant-based meat substitutes; social life cycle assessment; sustainability; MEAT CONSUMPTION; SUSTAINABILITY; HEALTH; FUTURE; CHALLENGES; NUTRITION; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.11655
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Extensive research shows that replacing animal protein with plant-based protein in the diet would strongly alleviate the environmental impact of the food system. However, much less attention has been given to the socio-economic considerations of dietary transitions. This study analyses the socio-economic performance of innovative legume-based food prototypes, developed in the Protein2Food research project, and conventional animal-based products (chicken meat and dairy milk). We implement a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) to quantify and compare their potential socio-economic impacts along the entire life cycle. RESULTS Findings from this analysis show that legume-based prototypes and their respective animal-based counterparts have, overall, a comparable socio-economic performance. Looking at the disaggregated life cycle stages, socio-economic hotspots (points of most negative impacts) were mainly identified at the production stage in legume-based products. Farm-level net margin and profitability are low when compared with their animal equivalents. However, at the processing stage, there are socio-economic gains for plant-based products regarding lower unemployment rates. Finally, at the consumption stage, there are mixed results. Plant-based products show worse protein affordability but better nutritional contents (lower saturated fat and cholesterol) than their animal counterparts. CONCLUSIONS To improve socio-economic performance of legume-based foods, greater emphasis should be placed upon developing improved processing technologies and supply chains. This would broaden the supply of sustainable protein-rich food options and make these products more economically attractive. The research illustrates that policies should be targeted to the different stages of the food value chain to optimize the development of innovative plant-based foods. (c) 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:5111 / 5120
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of animal-based foods and plant-based protein-rich alternatives: an environmental perspective
    Detzel, Andreas
    Kruger, Martina
    Busch, Mirjam
    Blanco-Gutierrez, Irene
    Varela, Consuelo
    Manners, Rhys
    Bez, Jurgen
    Zannini, Emanuele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2022, 102 (12) : 5098 - 5110
  • [2] Animal-based and plant-based protein-rich foods and cardiovascular health: a complex conundrum
    Campbell, Wayne W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 110 (01): : 8 - 9
  • [3] Plant- and Animal-Based Protein-Rich Foods and Cardiovascular Health
    Yu Wang
    Erica R. Hill
    Wayne W. Campbell
    Lauren E. O’Connor
    [J]. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2022, 24 : 197 - 213
  • [4] Plant- and Animal-Based Protein-Rich Foods and Cardiovascular Health
    Wang, Yu
    Hill, Erica R.
    Campbell, Wayne W.
    O'Connor, Lauren E.
    [J]. CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2022, 24 (04) : 197 - 213
  • [5] Ultraprocessed plant-based foods: Designing the next generation of healthy and sustainable alternatives to animal-based foods
    McClements, David Julian
    [J]. COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2023, 22 (05): : 3531 - 3559
  • [6] Barriers to and Facilitators of the Consumption of Animal-Based Protein-Rich Foods in Older Adults
    Appleton, K. M.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2016, 8 (04):
  • [7] Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses
    Blanco-Gutierrez, Irene
    Varela-Ortega, Consuelo
    Manners, Rhys
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 26
  • [8] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Milk and Plant-Based Alternatives
    Grant, Courtney A.
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (11) : 1235 - 1247
  • [9] Plant-Based Meat and Dairy Substitutes as Appropriate Alternatives to Animal-Based Products?
    Khandpur, Neha
    Martinez-Steele, Euridice
    Sun, Qi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2021, 151 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [10] Substituting animal-based with plant-based foods—current evidence and challenges ahead
    Daniel B. Ibsen
    [J]. BMC Global and Public Health, 2 (1):