Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Clinical Follow-Up at 15 Years

被引:62
|
作者
Gille, Justus [1 ]
Behrens, Peter [2 ]
Schulz, Arndt Peter [1 ]
Oheim, Ralf [3 ]
Kienast, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Schleswig Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] CUNO Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[3] BG Trauma Hosp Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
knee; joint involved; cartilage; MACI; MACT; cells; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE REPAIR; OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEES; CHONDRAL DEFECTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; TRANSPLANTATION; MICROFRACTURE; REGENERATION; SUCCESS; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1177/1947603516638901
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. A prospective clinical investigation was carried out in order to clarify whether Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) results in clinical improvement at long-term follow-up. Hypothesis. MACI will result in clinical improvement at long-term follow-up. Study Design. Case series; level of evidence, 4. Methods. Thirty-eight patients were treated with MACI. These patients were evaluated for up to a mean of 16 years (range 15-17 years) after the intervention. Three different scores (Lysholm-Gilquist score, International Cartilage Repair Society score, and Tegner score) formed the basis of this study. Overall, we were able to obtain valid preoperative and postoperative results from 18 (47%) of 38 patients. In 1 patient, both knees were treated. In 4 patients, an arthroplasty was implanted over the course of time; thus they were excluded from this case series. In conclusion, follow-up of 15 knees was performed in the recent series. Results. In subjective rating, 12 out of 14 patients (86%) rated the function of their knee as much better or better than before the index procedure. All numerical outcome scores showed significant improvement compared to the preoperative value (preoperative/postoperative at 5 years/postoperative at 15 years): Lysholm score 59.6 (24.6)/78.6 (+/- 21.5)/82.7 (+/- 11.3), International Knee Documentation Committee score 50.6 (+/- 22.7)/64.7 (+/- 21.6)/69.7 (+/- 18.7), Tegner score 3.0 (+/- 2.2)/3.6 (+/- 1.5)/5.2 (+/- 1.7). Conclusion. The significantly improved results on 3 scores after 15 years suggest that MACI represents a suitable treatment of local cartilage defects in the knee.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 315
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation and implantation for an osteochondral defect after cement treatment of a giant cell tumor
    Kent, Michael
    Smith, Richard Carey
    Robertson, Brett
    Wood, David
    Zheng, Ming Hao
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2009, 20 (05): : 575 - 578
  • [32] Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation of the Ankle A 2-to 5-Year Follow-Up
    Nam, Ellis Kevin
    Ferkel, Richard D.
    Applegate, Gregory R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02): : 274 - 284
  • [33] Arthroscopic Fixation of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Importance of Fixation Pin Angle on Joint Compression Forces
    Herbort, Mirco
    Zelle, Sandra
    Rosenbaum, Dieter
    Osada, Nani
    Raschke, Michael
    Petersen, Wolf
    Zantop, Thore
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (06): : 809 - 816
  • [34] Role of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroids in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee: A Systematic Review
    Vonk, Lucienne Angela
    Roel, Giulietta
    Hernigou, Jacques
    Kaps, Christian
    Hernigou, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (13)
  • [35] TREATMENT OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE LESIONS IN THE KNEE USING HIGH DENSITY AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION: TWO YEARS FOLLOW-UP
    Rodriguez-Inigo, E.
    Lopez-Alcorocho, J.
    Aboli, L.
    Guillen-Vicente, I.
    Guillen-Vicente, M.
    Fernandez-Jaen, T.
    Arauz, S.
    Abelow, S.
    Guillen, P.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2017, 25 : S161 - S161
  • [36] Long-Term Outcomes after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Systematic Review at Mean Follow-Up of 11.4 Years
    Pareek, Ayoosh
    Carey, James L.
    Reardon, Patrick J.
    Peterson, Lars
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Krych, Aaron J.
    CARTILAGE, 2016, 7 (04) : 298 - 308
  • [37] Clinical evaluation after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation A COMPARISON OF FOUR DIFFERENT GRAFT TYPES
    Binder, H.
    Hoffman, L.
    Zak, L.
    Tiefenboeck, T.
    Aldrian, S.
    Albrecht, C.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (07): : 370 - 379
  • [38] Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). Minimally invasive technique in the knee
    Anders, Sven
    Schaumburger, Jens
    Schubert, Thomas
    Grifka, Joachim
    Behrens, Peter
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2008, 20 (03): : 208 - 219
  • [39] The role of autologous bone grafting in matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation at the knee: Results from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)
    Weishorn, Johannes
    Tischer, Thomas
    Niemeyer, Philipp
    Renkawitz, Tobias
    Bangert, Yannic
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024, 32 (04) : 929 - 940
  • [40] Matrix-induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) Grafting for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Clinical and Radiological Long-Term Follow-Up (8410)
    Lenz, Christopher
    Tan, Shu
    Carey, Andrew L.
    Ang, Kaensong
    Schneider, Timothy E.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2020, : S33 - S33