A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections

被引:115
|
作者
Kinsella, S. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Bristol BS2 8EG, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05499.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Anaesthesia for Caesarean section was audited over a 5 year period: 5080 cases were performed using spinal 63%, epidural top-up 26%, combined spinal-epidural 5% and primary general anaesthesia 5%. The rate of general anaesthesia conversion of regional anaesthesia was 0.8% for elective and 4.9% for emergency Caesarean section compared to Royal College of Anaesthetists targets of 1% and 3%. The rate of conversion of regional to general anaesthesia in category 1 Caesarean section was 20%. A total of 8% of women had general anaesthesia when both primary general and conversion of regional anaesthesia were combined. The rate of failure to achieve a pain-free operation was 6% with spinals, 24% with epidural top-up and 18% with combined spinal-epidural. Besides the type of anaesthesia and operative urgency, other factors associated with pre-operative failure of regional anaesthesia included body mass index, no previous Caesareans, and indication for Caesarean of acute fetal distress or maternal medical condition. Inadequacy of pre-operative anaesthetic block and duration of surgery were important risk factors for intra-operative failure. For spinal anaesthesia, use of a spinal opioid was associated with less pre-operative failure. For epidural top-up anaesthesia, lower epidural top-up volume was associated with less pre-operative failure, and use of adrenaline was associated with both less pre-operative and intra-operative failure. The rate of serious adverse incidents was 1 : 126 with general anaesthesia and 1 : 501 with regional anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 832
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using the Robson classification to audit caesarean sections
    McMahon, G.
    Daly, N.
    Imcha, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 111 - 111
  • [22] A survey of the use of regional anaesthesia for caesarean sections in level 1 and 2 hospitals in the Free State
    Lamacraft, G
    Hollingworth, S
    Dowie, JG
    Schmidt, MJ
    Diedricks, BJS
    Joubert, G
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 94 (09): : 762 - 763
  • [23] Audit on quality of documentation in caesarean sections in obstetrics
    Papadakis, K.
    Karunyam, B.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 29 - 30
  • [24] AUDIT OF THE TIMING OF ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTIONS AT TERM
    Coyle, C.
    Burke, G.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 180 : 162 - 162
  • [25] Raising the standards: an audit of caesarean section anaesthesia techniques and failure rates in a district general hospital
    Grounds, G.
    Waight, G.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 : 52 - 52
  • [26] An audit of block documentation for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
    Corcoran, F.
    Brennan, C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 69 : 28 - 28
  • [27] Managing anaesthesia during caesarean sections in dogs and cats
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2016, 179 (03) : 62 - 62
  • [28] Avoiding awareness in Caesarean sections under general anaesthesia
    Jackson, M. J.
    McCormack, V.
    Shorrock, P.
    Lie, J.
    Hanison, J.
    Baylis, C.
    Leech, M.
    Scott, A.
    Plummer, N.
    Blomeley, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 114 (03) : 530 - 531
  • [29] Anaesthesia outcome of 842 consequtive emergency caesarean sections
    Vaananen, Antti
    Eriksson, Heidi
    Kainu, Petter
    Lang, Marko
    Sarvela, Johanna
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 57 : 17 - 17
  • [30] Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section
    Afolabi, B. B.
    Lesi, F. E. A.
    Merah, N. A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):