Challenges and possible solutions to creating an achievable and effective Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

被引:9
|
作者
Hughes, Alice [1 ]
Shen, Xiaoli [2 ]
Corlett, Richard [3 ]
Li, Lin [4 ]
Luo, Maofang [2 ]
Woodley, Stephen [5 ]
Zhang, Yuanming [6 ]
Ma, Keping [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Biol Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, Zhejiang Qianjiangyuan Forest Biodivers Natl Obse, Beijing, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Menglun, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] WWF Int, Global Policy & Advocacy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] IUCN, World Commiss Protected Areas, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[6] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Urumqi, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Convention on Biological Diversity; Aichi Targets; monitoring framework; sustainable development;
D O I
10.1080/20964129.2022.2124196
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Global biodiversity is in crisis as a result of human activity. This biodiversity crisis has been well documented by scientists, recognized by world leaders, politicians, businesses, and citizens. Both the biodiversity and climate crises need to be addressed now. 2020 was when this change was supposed to start, with the 15th Conference of Parties (COP15) of the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) meeting in Kunming, and the 26th Conference of Parties (COP26) of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change meeting in Glasgow, but both meetings were postponed. COP26 was held a year late (November 2021), while COP15 was split into two, with the first part held in Kunming in October 2021, and the second part scheduled for Montreal in December 2022. This meeting in Montreal - arguably the most important in the CBDs history - must agree on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), to reverse biodiversity loss. Failure to reach agreement in Montreal would ultimately be a failure of us all, with irreversible consequences for life on earth. Yet, with three months before the final deadline only 20% of text and two targets are agreed. This paper reviews the factors hindering progress on the agreement and suggests possible solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Practical application of indicators for genetic diversity in CBD post-2020 global biodiversity framework implementation
    Thurfjell, Henrik
    Laikre, Linda
    Ekblom, Robert
    Hoban, Sean
    Sjogren-Gulve, Per
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [32] Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved
    Hoban, Sean
    Bruford, Michael
    Jackson, Josephine D'Urban
    Lopes-Fernandes, Margarida
    Heuertz, Myriam
    Hohenlohe, Paul A.
    Paz-Vinas, Ivan
    Sjogren-Gulve, Per
    Segelbacher, Gernot
    Vernesi, Cristiano
    Aitken, Sally
    Bertola, Laura D.
    Bloomer, Paulette
    Breed, Martin
    Rodriguez-Correa, Hernando
    Funk, W. Chris
    Grueber, Catherine E.
    Hunter, Margaret E.
    Jaffe, Rodolfo
    Liggins, Libby
    Mergeay, Joachim
    Moharrek, Farideh
    O'Brien, David
    Ogden, Rob
    Palma-Silva, Clarisse
    Pierson, Jennifer
    Ramakrishnan, Uma
    Simo-Droissart, Murielle
    Tani, Naoki
    Waits, Lisette
    Laikre, Linda
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 248
  • [33] Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas
    Meng, Ziqi
    Dong, Jinwei
    Ellis, Erle C.
    Metternicht, Graciela
    Qin, Yuanwei
    Song, Xiao-Peng
    Lofqvist, Sara
    Garrett, Rachael D.
    Jia, Xiaopeng
    Xiao, Xiangming
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6 (07) : 758 - 768
  • [34] Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas
    Ziqi Meng
    Jinwei Dong
    Erle C. Ellis
    Graciela Metternicht
    Yuanwei Qin
    Xiao-Peng Song
    Sara Löfqvist
    Rachael D. Garrett
    Xiaopeng Jia
    Xiangming Xiao
    Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6 : 758 - 768
  • [35] Biodiversity data synthesis is critical for realizing a functional post-2020 framework
    Orr, Michael C.
    Hughes, Alice C.
    Costello, Mark J.
    Qiao, Huijie
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 274
  • [36] Toward post-2020 global biodiversity conservation: Footprint and direction in China
    Wei, Fuwen
    INNOVATION, 2021, 2 (04):
  • [37] Area-based conservation planning in Japan: The importance of OECMs in the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
    Shiono, Takayuki
    Kubota, Yasuhiro
    Kusumoto, Buntarou
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 30
  • [38] EU wine policy in the framework of the CAP: post-2020 challenges
    Eugenio Pomarici
    Roberta Sardone
    Agricultural and Food Economics, 8
  • [39] Essential indicators for measuring site-based conservation effectiveness in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Deguignet, Marine
    Balmford, Andrew
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Dudley, Nigel
    Hockings, Marc
    Kingston, Naomi
    Klimmek, Helen
    Lewis, Alanah Hayley
    Rahbek, Carsten
    Stolton, Sue
    Vincent, Claire
    Wells, Sue
    Woodley, Stephen
    Watson, James E. M.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2021, 14 (04):
  • [40] EU wine policy in the framework of the CAP: post-2020 challenges
    Pomarici, Eugenio
    Sardone, Roberta
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD ECONOMICS, 2020, 8 (01)