Vaccination of rainbow trout against infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) by using attenuated mutants selected by neutralizing monoclonal antibodies

被引:1
|
作者
Roberti, KA
Rohovec, JS
Winton, JR
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Western Fisheries Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Microbiol, Corvallis, OR USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
D O I
10.1577/1548-8667(1998)010<0328:VORTAI>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
A neutralizing monoclonal antibody against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) was used to select neutralization-resistant mutants from isolates of virus obtained from adult: steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss returning to the Round Butte Hatchery (RB mutants) on the Deschutes River in Oregon, USA, and from rainbow trout (nonanadromous O. mykiss) at a commercial hatchery in the Hagerman Valley of Idaho, USA (193-110 mutants). Two of the mutants, RB-1 and 193-110-4, were significantly (P < 0.001) attenuated compared with parental strains. Vaccination of rainbow trout by waterborne exposure to the mutants conferred solid protection against challenge with wild-type virus. In some trials, fish vaccinated with the RB-1 mutant at 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) of 1 x 10(4)-1 x 10(5) TCID50/mL or with the 193-110-4 mutant at 1 x 10(2)-1 x 10(3) TCID50/mL, hell for 14 d, then challenged with the homologous wild-type strain at 1 x 10(5) TCID50/mL showed relative percent survival of 95-100% (P < 0.005). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in protection among fish exposed to the RB-1 vaccine strain at a dose of 1 x 105 TCID50/mL for periods of either 1, 12, or 24 h, held for 14 d, and then challenged with the wild-type RB isolate, although the 1-h exposure seemed to be somewhat less effective. Fish were vaccinated with the RB-1 strain at 1 x 10(3)-1 x 10(5) TCID50/mL for 24 h then challenged after 1, 7, 14, or 21 d with the wildtype RB isolate. No significant (P > 0.1) protection was observed at 1 d postvaccination, but the relative percent survival increased progressively at each subsequent challenge period, becoming statistically significant by day 7 (P < 0.001) and beyond. These results suggested that: resistance to challenge with wild-type virus resulted from development of IHNV-specific immunity and not from viral interference or interferon induction, and they reinforce the potential elf an attenuated vaccine to control this important disease.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 337
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Bivalent DNA vaccine induces significant immune responses against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus and infectious pancreatic necrosis virus in rainbow trout
    Liming Xu
    Jingzhuang Zhao
    Miao Liu
    Guangming Ren
    Feng Jian
    Jiasheng Yin
    Ji Feng
    Hongbai Liu
    Tongyan Lu
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [22] Bivalent DNA vaccine induces significant immune responses against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus and infectious pancreatic necrosis virus in rainbow trout
    Xu, Liming
    Zhao, Jingzhuang
    Liu, Miao
    Ren, Guangming
    Jian, Feng
    Yin, Jiasheng
    Feng, Ji
    Liu, Hongbai
    Lu, Tongyan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [23] Virulence Change of Infectious Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus against Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss with Viral Molecular Evolution
    Mochizuki, Mamiko
    Kim, Hyoung Jun
    Kasai, Hisae
    Nishizawa, Toyohiko
    Yoshimizu, Mamoru
    FISH PATHOLOGY, 2009, 44 (04): : 159 - 165
  • [24] Development of a recombinant adenovirus-vectored vaccine against both infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus and infectious pancreatic necrosis virus in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
    Li, Shouhu
    Li, Xincang
    Yuan, Rui
    Chen, Xiaoxue
    Chen, Shouxu
    Qiu, Yu
    Yang, Qingfeng
    Wang, Meng
    Shi, Jiangao
    Zhang, Shuo
    FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 132
  • [25] Nanogram quantities of a DNA vaccine protect rainbow trout fry against heterologous strains of infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus
    Corbeil, S
    LaPatra, SE
    Anderson, ED
    Kurath, G
    VACCINE, 2000, 18 (25) : 2817 - 2824
  • [26] Antiviral effect of miR-206 in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus infection
    Wu, Shenji
    Huang, Jinqiang
    Li, Yongjuan
    FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 149
  • [27] The kinetics and protection of the antiviral state induced by recombinant iIFN1a in rainbow trout against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus
    Cao, Yongsheng
    Xu, Liming
    LaPatra, Scott E.
    Zhao, Jingzhuang
    Liu, Miao
    Liu, Hongbai
    Lu, Tongyan
    Zhang, Qiya
    MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 76 : 55 - 61
  • [28] Specificity of DNA vaccines against the U and M genogroups of infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
    Penaranda, Ma Michelle D.
    LaPatra, Scott E.
    Kurath, Gael
    FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 31 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [29] Immunity induced by recombinant attenuated IHNV (infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus)-GN438A expresses VP2 gene-encoded IPNV (infectious pancreatic necrosis virus) against both pathogens in rainbow trout
    Chen, Yaping
    Guo, Mengting
    Wang, Yanxue
    Hua, Xiaojing
    Gao, Shuai
    Wang, Yuting
    Li, Dechuan
    Shi, Wen
    Tang, Lijie
    Li, Yijing
    Liu, Min
    JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES, 2019, 42 (05) : 631 - 642
  • [30] Protective immunity and lack of histopathological damage two years after DNA vaccination against infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus in trout
    Kurath, G
    Garver, KA
    Corbeil, S
    Elliott, DG
    Anderson, ED
    LaPatra, SE
    VACCINE, 2006, 24 (03) : 345 - 354