Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes

被引:21
|
作者
Zander-Fox, Deirdre L. [1 ]
Tremellen, Kelton [1 ,2 ]
Lane, Michelle [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Repromed, Dulwich, SA, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Obstet & Gynaecol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; blastocyst culture; In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF); multiple birth; single embryo transfer; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ASSISTED REPRODUCTION; RELEVANT STANDARD; MULTIPLE BIRTHS; TWINS; AUSTRALIA; GESTATION; SELECTION; SUCCESS; MOTHERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01324.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal outcome after IVF is a live, healthy, singleton term baby. This can be achieved by transferring a single embryo, but at the possible expense of reducing pregnancy rates. Recent studies suggest that delaying transfer of embryos to the blastocyst stage (day 4/5), rather than the more traditional cleavage stage (day 2-3), allows for better selection of the best embryo, maximising pregnancy rates from a single embryo transfer (SET). The aim of this study was to assess pregnancy outcomes in relation to changing embryo transfer practices. Methods: A retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcomes was made between IVF cycles conducted in 2007 when blastocyst SET became standard practice, with IVF cycles in 2003 when double cleavage-stage embryo transfer was the norm. Results: The implementation of a blastocyst SET policy resulted in a significant decrease in multiple birth rates, while maintaining live birth delivery rate comparable to double cleavage-stage transfer (27.2% versus 24.8%, respectively, N.S.). Conclusion: Improvements in culturing protocols have facilitated extended culture, increasing embryo selection capability. These results indicate that it is now possible to maintain excellent pregnancy rates with SET blastocyst culture, while decreasing complications related to multiple births.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 410
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A retrospective comparative study of double cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus single blastocyst in frozen-thawed cycles
    Lim, Yun-Hsuen
    Sim, Poo Keen
    Nadkarni, Prashant
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [32] A retrospective comparative study of double cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus single blastocyst in frozen-thawed cycles
    Yun-Hsuen Lim
    Poo Keen Sim
    Prashant Nadkarni
    [J]. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 29
  • [33] Three blastocyst stage embryo transfer resulting in a quintuplet pregnancy
    Yakín, K
    Kahraman, S
    Cömert, S
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (04) : 782 - 784
  • [34] Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes
    Martins, W. P.
    Nastri, C. O.
    Rienzi, L.
    Van der Poel, S. Z.
    Gracia, C.
    Racowsky, C.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (05) : 583 - 591
  • [35] Comparing the pregnancy outcomes of cleavage and blastocyst stage in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A cross-sectional study
    Parsafar, Zahra
    Dehghani-Firouzabadi, Razieh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 21 (11) : 929 - 936
  • [36] EFFECT OF EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT AND GRADE ON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES FOLLOWING FRESH AND VITRIFIED SINGLE BLASTOCYST EMBRYO TRANSFER
    Roy, T.
    Peura, T.
    McArthur, S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S44 - S45
  • [37] Elective Single Embryo Transfer vs. Double Embryo Transfer: Evaluation of Pregnancy and Multiple Gestation Rates
    Heitmann, Ryan J.
    Burney, Richard O.
    Klein, Nancy
    Chow, Gregory E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : S27 - S27
  • [38] Cleavage-stage embryo cryopreservation/warming and blastocyst stage embryo transfer is more beneficial over blastocyst stage embryo cryopreservation/ warming strategy in good responder patients
    Kavrut, M.
    Gultomruk, M.
    Findikli, N.
    Boynukalin, F. K.
    Karlikaya, G.
    Celik, C.
    Bahceci, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 47 - 48
  • [39] Comparison of perinatal outcomes following blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer: analysis of 10 years' data from a single centre
    Shi, Wenhao
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Na
    Xue, Xia
    Liu, Chen
    Qu, Pengfei
    Shi, Juanzi
    Huang, Chen
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (06) : 967 - 978
  • [40] Embryo fragmentation as a determinant of blastocyst development in vitro and pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer
    Stone, BA
    Greene, J
    Vargyas, JM
    Ringler, GE
    Marrs, RP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (06) : 2014 - 2019