Spatial interpolation methods for nonstationary plume data

被引:38
|
作者
Reed, PM
Ellsworth, TR
Minsker, BS
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.tb02667.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Plume interpolation consists of estimating contaminant concentrations at unsampled locations using the available contaminant data surrounding those locations. The goal of ground water plume interpolation is to maximize the accuracy in estimating the spatial distribution of the contaminant plume given the data limitations associated with sparse monitoring networks with irregular geometries. Beyond data limitations, contaminant plume interpolation is a difficult task because contaminant concentration fields are highly heterogeneous, anisotropic, and nonstationary phenomena. This study provides a comprehensive performance analysis of six interpolation methods for scatter-point concentration data, ranging in complexity from intrinsic kriging based on intrinsic random function theory to a traditional implementation of inverse-distance weighting. High resolution simulation data of perchloroethylene (PCE) contamination in a highly heterogeneous alluvial aquifer were used to generate three test cases, which vary in the size and complexity of their contaminant plumes as well as the number of data available to support interpolation. Overall, the variability of PCE samples and preferential sampling controlled how well each of the interpolation schemes performed. Quantile kriging was the most robust of the interpolation methods, showing the least bias from both of these factors. This study provides guidance to practitioners balancing opposing theoretical perspectives, ease-of-implementation, and effectiveness when choosing a plume interpolation method.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 202
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Surface Temperature in Thailand
    Tiengrod, Panudda
    Wongseree, Waranyu
    2013 INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ICSEC), 2013, : 174 - 178
  • [42] Spatial statistics and interpolation methods for TOF SIMS imaging
    Milillo, Tammy M.
    Gardella, Joseph A., Jr.
    APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2006, 252 (19) : 6883 - 6890
  • [43] Approximation Methods and Spatial Interpolation in Distributed Control Systems
    Motee, Nader
    Jadbabaie, Ali
    2009 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 860 - +
  • [45] Spatial interpolation methods for integrating Newton's equation
    Gueron, S
    Shalloway, D
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1996, 129 (01) : 87 - 100
  • [46] Performance evaluation of spatial interpolation methods in the presence of noise
    Demirhan, M
    Özpinar, A
    Özdamar, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (06) : 1237 - 1258
  • [47] A Multitemporal Profile-Based Interpolation Method for Gap Filling Nonstationary Data
    Malambo, Lonesome
    Heatwole, Conrad D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (01): : 252 - 261
  • [48] Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review
    Li, Jin
    Heap, Andrew D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 53 : 173 - 189
  • [49] Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for maize growth period
    College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao, 2009, 9 (163-167):
  • [50] Seismic data interpolation using frequency-domain complex nonstationary autoregression
    Liu, Guochang
    Chen, Xiaohong
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2018, 66 (03) : 478 - 497