Women's Experiences of Fetal Movements before the Confirmation of Fetal DeathContractions Misinterpreted as Fetal Movement

被引:40
|
作者
Linde, Anders [1 ,2 ]
Pettersson, Karin [1 ]
Radestad, Ingela [2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Sophiahemmet Univ, SE-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2015年 / 42卷 / 02期
关键词
content analysis; fetal movement; stillbirth; EPILEPTIFORM ACTIVITY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12151
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundDecreased fetal movement often precedes a stillbirth. The objective of this study was to describe women's experiences of fetal movement before the confirmation of fetal death. MethodsData were collected through a Web-based questionnaire. Women with stillbirths after 28 gestational weeks were self-recruited. Content analysis was used to analyze the answers to one open question. The statements from mothers of a stillborn, born during gestational weeks 28 to 36 were compared with those of a stillborn at term. ResultsThe women's 215 answers were divided into three categories: decreased, weak, and no fetal movement at all; 154 (72%) of the descriptions were divided into three subcategories: decreased and weak movement (106; 49%), no movement at all (35; 16%), and contraction interpreted as movement (13; 6%). The category fetal movement as normal includes 39 (18%) of the descriptions. The third category, extremely vigorous fetal activity followed by no movement at all, includes 22 (10%) of the descriptions. Eight (15%) of the women with stillbirths in gestational weeks 28 to 36 interpreted contractions as fetal movement as compared to 5 (5%) of the women with stillbirths at term. DiscussionUterine contractions can be interpreted as fetal movement. A single episode of extremely vigorous fetal activity can precede fetal death. The majority of the women experienced decreased, weaker, or no fetal movement at all 2days before fetal death was diagnosed. Mothers should be educated to promptly report changes in fetal movement to their health care providers. Using fetal movement information to evaluate possible fetal distress may lead to reductions in stillbirths.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 194
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FETAL HEART-RATE RESPONSES TO FETAL MOVEMENTS
    ALADJEM, S
    FERIA, A
    REST, J
    STOJANOVIC, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (07): : 487 - 491
  • [42] Women's perceptions of fetal movements in full-term pregnancy
    Radestad, Ingela
    Lindgren, Helena
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2012, 3 (03) : 113 - 116
  • [43] Reduced fetal movements: an important predictor of fetal compromise
    Sharma, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 79 - 80
  • [44] FETAL MOVEMENTS AS AN INDICATOR OF FETAL WELL-BEING
    NELDAM, S
    DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 33 (05) : 213 - 221
  • [45] The quality of fetal arm movements as indicators of fetal stress
    Reissland, Nadja
    Francis, Brian
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 86 (12) : 813 - 816
  • [46] Counting fetal movements as a universal test for fetal wellbeing
    Berbey, R
    Manduley, A
    Vigil-De Gracia, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2001, 74 (03) : 293 - 295
  • [47] EFFECT OF FETAL BREATHING MOVEMENTS ON FETAL CARDIAC HEMODYNAMICS
    VANDERMOOREN, K
    WLADIMIROFF, JW
    STIJNEN, T
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (08): : 787 - 790
  • [48] OVERNIGHT RECORDINGS OF FETAL HEART SOUNDS AND FETAL MOVEMENTS
    SOUTHALL, DP
    COLLEY, N
    TALBERT, DG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1985, 20 (02): : 85 - 86
  • [49] FETAL BREATHING MOVEMENTS - ANTEPARTUM MONITORING OF FETAL CONDITION
    MANNING, FA
    PLATT, LD
    CLINICS IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1979, 6 (02): : 335 - 349
  • [50] Does fetal tracheal fluid flow during fetal breathing movements change before the onset of labour?
    Kalache, KD
    Chaoui, R
    Marks, B
    Wauer, R
    Bollmann, R
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (05) : 514 - 519