Clinical Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients

被引:10
|
作者
Huang, Christina C. [1 ]
Rescorla, Frederick J. [1 ,2 ]
Landman, Matthew P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Surg, Riley Hosp Children, Div Pediat Surg, Indianapolis, IN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; Total proctocolectomy; Ulcerative colitis; Familial adenomatous polyposis; FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS; RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard surgical reconstruction for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis (UC) who undergo total proctocolectomy (TPC). Although patients receive the same reconstruction, their postoperative complications can differ. We hypothesize that indication for TPC and other preoperative clinical factors are associated with differences in postoperative outcomes following IPAA. Methods: A retrospective cohort of pediatric patients who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA from 1996 to 2016 was identified. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative clinical variables were collected. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate for relevant postoperative clinical differences. Results: Seventy-nine patients, 17 with FAP and 62 with UC, were identified. FAP patients spent a mean of 1125 +/- 1011 d between initial diagnosis and first surgery compared to 585 +/- 706 d by UC patients (P = 0.038). FAP patients took a mean of 57 +/- 38 d to complete TPC with IPAA compared to UC patients at 177 +/- 121 d (P < 0.001). FAP and UC patients did not differ in mean number of bowel movements at their 6-mo postoperative visit (4.7 +/- 2.1 versus 5.6 +/- 1.9, respectively [P = 0.134]). FAP patients were less likely to experience pouchitis (P = 0.009), pouch failure (P < 0.001), and psychiatric symptoms (P = 0.019) but more likely to experience bowel obstruction (P = 0.002). Conclusions: IPAA is a safe, restorative treatment for FAP and UC patients after TPC. Based on diagnosis and preoperative course, there are differences in morbidity in IPAA patients. Clinical data such as these will allow surgeons to help families anticipate their child's preoperative and postoperative courses and to maximize successful postoperative outcomes. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 76
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SEXUAL FUNCTION AFTER ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    DOZOIS, RR
    NELSON, H
    METCALF, AM
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1993, 47 (10): : 1009 - 1013
  • [22] Lifestyle and Limitations after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis
    Hendren, Samantha
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (02) : 137 - 138
  • [23] PROCTECTOMY WITH ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    HAUTEFEUILLE, P
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1993, 47 (10): : 956 - 958
  • [24] Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Alves, A
    Panis, Y
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2005, 130 (6-7): : 421 - 425
  • [25] THE ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS PROCEDURE
    SACLARIDES, TJ
    PROBLEMS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 1990, 7 (03): : 463 - 470
  • [26] The perfect ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Ecker, N.
    Woywod, A-C
    Ecker, K-W
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (04) : 339 - 342
  • [27] DIRECT ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    BRAUN, J
    SCHUMPELICK, V
    CHIRURG, 1993, 64 (08): : 614 - 621
  • [28] CONTRAINDICATIONS OF ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    COHEN, Z
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1993, 47 (10): : 946 - 947
  • [29] Sexual activity in patients after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
    Kluska, Piotr
    Dzika-Andrysiak, Katarzyna
    Mik, Michal
    Zelga, Piotr
    Wlodarczyk, Marcin
    Kujawski, Ryszard
    Dziki, Lukasz
    Dziki, Adam
    Trzcinski, Radzislaw
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 93 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [30] CARCINOMA AND THE ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
    WILTZ, O
    HASHMI, HF
    SCHOETZ, DJ
    ROBERTS, PL
    MURRAY, JJ
    COLLER, JA
    VEIDENHEIMER, MC
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1991, 34 (09) : 805 - 809