Feasibility Study of Pelvic Helical IMRT for Elderly Patients with Endometrial Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Nickers, Philippe [1 ,5 ]
Tresch, Emmanuelle [2 ,5 ]
Cordoba, Abel [1 ,5 ]
Leblanc, Eric [3 ,5 ]
Comte, Pauline [1 ,5 ]
Lacornerie, Thomas [1 ,5 ]
Lartigau, Eric [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Oscar Lambret Comprehens Canc Ctr, Acad Radiat Oncol Dept, Lille, France
[2] Oscar Lambret Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Lille, France
[3] Oscar Lambret Comprehens Canc Ctr, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Lille, France
[4] Univ Lille 2, Fac Med, Lille, France
[5] ONCOLille, Maison Reg Rech Clin, Lille, France
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 11期
关键词
INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT TREATMENT; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; TRIAL; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0113279
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: Standard treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer involves surgery (when possible) followed by brachytherapy or external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk tumors. EBRT is not without toxicity, meaning that it could be difficult to complete for elderly patients, who typically have decreased reserve and resistance to stressors. Patients and methods: Patients aged 70 and over treated between April 2009 and May 2013 for endometrial cancer and received IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy) were included in this observational study. IMRT could be performed as adjuvant treatment or as an exclusive treatment for patients not amenable to surgery. The primary endpoints of this study were to assess the feasibility and toxicity of pelvic IMRT in this population. Secondary endpoints were to assess disease-specific survival, overall survival, and local control. Predictors of toxicity were also explored. Results: Forty seven consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 75 years (range, 70-89 years). Eleven patients were aged 80 years and older. Toxicities were found in thirty four patients (72%) during treatment. Among these, toxicity did not exceed grade 2 for 32 patients (68%). Two patients had a grade 3 toxicity (4%). Overall survival rates were 87% and 83% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Six patients (12.8%) had a local relapse and nine others (19.1%) had distant relapse. Conclusions: Pelvic helical IMRT for patients aged 70 and older is feasible with full standard radiation doses, showing that age greater than 70 should not be considered as a reason not to perform optimal treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparative study between helical IMRT and tomodirect IMRT in bilateral breast cancer: which is the best technique?
    Negretti, L.
    Schombourg, K.
    Biggiogero, M.
    Ballerini, G.
    Corradini, N.
    Leick, M.
    Pellanda, A. Franzetti
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (01) : 98 - 98
  • [22] The feasibility and benefits of IMRT use for the treatment of pelvic bone metastases
    Scott, S.
    La Macchia, N.
    Craig, T.
    Holwell, M.
    Parent, A.
    Wong, R.
    Levin, W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S63 - S63
  • [23] Dosimetric Comparison of Adjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT)
    Temelli, Oztun
    Demirtas, Mehmet
    Sisecioglu, Mahmut Serdar
    Pepele, Eda Kaya
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 3 (03): : 203 - 210
  • [24] IMRT for supportive treatment of Endometrial Cancer The french RTCMIENDOMETRE-Study
    Foerster, Robert
    Lindel, Katja
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (04) : 387 - 389
  • [25] Feasibility Study of In-Vivo Transit Dosimetry for IMRT Patients
    Kim, G.
    Rice, R.
    Detorie, N.
    Dragojevic, I.
    Pawlicki, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3590 - +
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of IMRT after Surgery in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: RTOG 0418 Phase II Study
    Jhingran, A.
    Winter, K.
    Portelance, L.
    Miller, B. E.
    Salehpour, M. R.
    Gaur, R.
    Souhami, L.
    Small, W.
    Gaffney, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S45 - S45
  • [27] Robotic infrarenal paraaortic and pelvic nodal staging for endometrial cancer: feasibility and lymphatic complications
    Geppert, Barbara
    Persson, Jan
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 94 (10) : 1074 - 1081
  • [28] Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer and morbid obesity
    Gilabert, J.
    Gilabert-Estelles, J.
    Paya, V.
    Rodenas, J. J.
    Coloma, F.
    Costa, S.
    Santana, A.
    Aliaga, R.
    Proceedings of the 15th Annual Congress of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy, 2006, : 17 - 25
  • [29] Significance of Positive Pelvic Washing Cytology in Patients with Endometrial Cancer
    Lee, B. B.
    Roh, M. H.
    Johnston, C. M.
    Knoepp, S. M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 97A - 97A
  • [30] CCRT with or without surgery using Helical Tomotherapy or IMRT for esophageal cancer patients
    Hou, P. Y.
    Le-Jung, W.
    Chen-Hsi, H.
    Pei-Wei, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S601 - S601