A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures

被引:161
|
作者
Amick, BC
Lerner, D
Rogers, WH
Rooney, T
Katz, JN
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX 77225 USA
[2] Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] New England Med Ctr, Div Clin Care Res, Hlth Inst, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Tufts Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Hlth & Work Outcomes, Brunswick, ME USA
[6] Robert B Brigham Multipurpose Arthrit & Musculosk, Boston, MA USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Rheumatol Immunol & Allergy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200012150-00010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the growing recognition that work can contribute to the development of musculoskeletal disorders,(1,8) there are almost no data on whether and how physicians investigate the contribution of work to patients' health status or the influence of health status on work performance. This is particularly true of primary care, where much of the medical care for patients with work-related low back pain is provided.(51) As more patients with musculoskeletal injuries show up in primary care settings, it will become important to document health-related work outcomes and incorporate into practice outcome tools that enable the physician to obtain a quick and accurate accounting of needed information about patients' work. Health-related work outcomes relate to a person's labor market status: Is a person working or not working? How well is he or she working? Did the person return to a job of pay and skill comparable to the preinjury job? Outcomes can incorporate time: How long has a person been out of work? How many hours, days, or weeks has a person been reported absent? Is the person working full- or part-time? How many hours does the person perform at full effectiveness? Finally, health-related work outcomes can capture the interplay between a person's health status and work role performance: How difficult is it for a person with a given health status to perform work activities? Typically, health-related work outcomes have not specifically referred to unpaid work activities, such as volunteer work or household labor. The authors support the importance of capturing both paid and unpaid work outcomes, but in this article, paid work is the focus. Multiple publications in the literature contribute conceptually and methodologically to the health-related work outcomes field. These range from industrial psychology and labor economics to health services research, epidemiology, and pharmacoeconomics. In this paper, a window into health-related work outcomes research is created by considering the reasons for measuring these outcomes and briefly reviewing and illustrating several classes of measures. The advantages and limitations of each measure will be discussed, as the authors draw examples from own work. Although prior work has focused on upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders, the general principles for using health-related work outcomes are similar for researchers studying back injuries and disorders. In addition, a new work-related health outcome tool for measuring successful return to work (RTW) is discussed to illustrate a new class of measures, Hereafter, health-related work outcomes as are referred to as work outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:3152 / 3160
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Health Outcome Measures for Diabetes Mellitus: A Review
    Bhatt, J. K.
    Thomas, Sabin
    Nanjan, M. J.
    [J]. APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2012, 7 (04) : 413 - 443
  • [42] Adult Measures of General Health and Health-Related Quality of Life
    Busija, Lucy
    Pausenberger, Eva
    Haines, Terry P.
    Haymes, Sharon
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Osborne, Richard H.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2011, 63 : S383 - S412
  • [43] Health status measures in young people's cancer trials; a time to move health-related quality of life up to primary outcome measures
    Walker, DA
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (01) : 159 - 160
  • [44] Health Status Measures in Young People’s Cancer Trials; A Time to Move Health-Related Quality of Life up to Primary Outcome Measures
    David A. Walker
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2006, 15 : 159 - 160
  • [45] Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcome measures in NASH-related cirrhosis
    McSweeney, Lorraine
    Breckons, Matthew
    Fattakhova, Gulnar
    Oluboyede, Yemi
    Vale, Luke
    Ternent, Laura
    Balp, Maria-Magdalena
    Doward, Lynda
    Brass, Clifford A.
    Beyer, Fiona
    Sanyal, Arun
    Anstee, Quentin M.
    [J]. JHEP REPORTS, 2020, 2 (03)
  • [46] Patient and observer reported outcome measures to evaluate health-related quality of life in inherited metabolic diseases: a scoping review
    Carlota Pascoal
    Sandra Brasil
    Rita Francisco
    Dorinda Marques-da-Silva
    Agnes Rafalko
    Jaak Jaeken
    Paula A. Videira
    Luísa Barros
    Vanessa dos Reis Ferreira
    [J]. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 13
  • [47] Oncology Section EDGE Task Force on Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life
    Harrington, Shana
    Lee, Jeannette
    Colon, Genevieve
    Alappattu, Meryl
    [J]. REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [48] Measures of health-related quality of life in diabetes-related foot disease: a systematic review
    Hogg, F. R. A.
    Peach, G.
    Price, P.
    Thompson, M. M.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 (03) : 552 - 565
  • [49] Measures of health-related quality of life in diabetes-related foot disease: a systematic review
    F. R. A. Hogg
    G. Peach
    P. Price
    M. M. Thompson
    R. J. Hinchliffe
    [J]. Diabetologia, 2012, 55 : 552 - 565
  • [50] Patient and observer reported outcome measures to evaluate health-related quality of life in inherited metabolic diseases: a scoping review
    Pascoal, Carlota
    Brasil, Sandra
    Francisco, Rita
    Marques-da-Silva, Dorinda
    Rafalko, Agnes
    Jaeken, Jaak
    Videira, Paula A.
    Barros, Luisa
    Ferreira, Vanessa dos Reis
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2018, 13