Growth and Yield Responses of Soybean to Row Spacing and Seeding Rate

被引:93
|
作者
Cox, William. J. [1 ]
Cherney, Jerome H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dep Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
PLANT-POPULATION; GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT; TILLAGE; COMPONENTS; WIDTH; CORN; DATE;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2010.0316
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Some growers in northern latitudes plant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] with a row crop planter in 0.38 m rows, but an economic analysis concluded that drilled soybean in rows <0.25 m was optimum in the North-Central United States. We planted two varieties in 0.19, 0.38, and 0.76 m rows at 321,000; 371,000; 420,000; and 469,000 seeds ha(-1) in New York in 2008 and 2009 to evaluate how soybean compensates to wide rows or low seeding rates in the Northeast United States. Soybean had limited compensation in biomass, pods, and seeds plant(-1) at wider rows so row spacing had linear responses for biomass accumulation (598, 554, and 497 g m(-2) in 0.19, 0.38. and 0.76 m rows, respectively) and leaf area index (LAI, 3.64, 3.47, and 3.16) at seed initiation; pod (1012, 935, and 875 pods m(-2)) and seed density (2272, 2230, and 2072 seeds m(-2), respectively) at harvest; and yield (3.37, 3.12, and 2.86 Mg ha(-1), respectively). Compensation in biomass, pods, and seeds plant(-1) at lower seeding rates resulted in similar biomass accumulation (528-570 g m(-2)), LAI (3.38-3.46), pod (921-965 pods m(-2)), and seed densities (2123 to 2234 seeds m(-2)) across seeding rates. Nevertheless, yield showed a quadratic response to seeding rate (3.04, 3.25, and 3.12 Mg ha(-1) at 321,000; 420,000; and 469,000 seeds ha(-1), respectively) with no row spacing interaction. Soybean compensated more at lower seeding rates than at wider rows, but field-scale studies are being conducted to evaluate the economics of both practices.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ROW SPACING AND SEEDING RATE EFFECTS ON CADETTE SPRING BARLEY
    PAGEAU, D
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1991, 19 (03) : 291 - 296
  • [42] Seeding rate and row spacing effect on weed competition, yield and quality of hemp in the Parkland region of Saskatchewan
    Vera, C. L.
    Woods, S. M.
    Raney, J. R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (03) : 911 - 915
  • [43] Biomass Yield and Feedstock Quality of Prairie Cordgrass in Response to Seeding Rate, Row Spacing, and Nitrogen Fertilization
    Guo, Jia
    Thapa, Santanu
    Voigt, Thomas
    Owens, Vance
    Boe, Arvid
    Lee, D. K.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2017, 109 (06) : 2474 - 2485
  • [44] Yield and growth responses of asparagus to between-row spacing and planting depth
    Loughton, A
    Baker, R
    Allen, OB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 76 (04) : 841 - 847
  • [45] ROW SPACING AND PLANTING DATE EFFECT ON YIELD AND GROWTH-RESPONSES OF SOYBEANS
    BOQUET, DJ
    KOONCE, KL
    WALKER, DM
    LOUISIANA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN, 1983, (754): : 1 - 24
  • [46] ROW SPACING AND SEEDING RATES TO OPTIMIZE SAFFLOWER YIELD ON THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES
    MUNDEL, HH
    MORRISON, RJ
    ENTZ, T
    BLACKSHAW, RE
    ROTH, BT
    KIEHN, F
    VANDENBERG, A
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1994, 74 (02) : 319 - 321
  • [47] Effect of Row Spacing, Seeding Rate, and Herbicide Program in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean on Palmer Amaranth Management
    Bell, Holden D.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Scott, Robert C.
    Popp, Michael
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 390 - 404
  • [48] THE EFFECTS OF SEEDING RATE AND ROW SPACING ON THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC ACTIVITY OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERR.)
    Mikheeva, O.
    Klymenko, I.
    Mikheev, V.
    Golovan, L.
    Dychenko, O.
    Stankevych, S.
    Chechui, H.
    Laslo, O.
    Chupryn, Y.
    Nahorna, S.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 19 (05): : 4169 - 4184
  • [49] Effect of row spacing and soybean genotype on mainstem and branch yield
    Norsworthy, JK
    Shipe, ER
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2005, 97 (03) : 919 - 923
  • [50] Growth and yield response of Cuphea to row spacing
    Gesch, RW
    Forcella, F
    Barbour, NW
    Voorheees, WB
    Phillips, B
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2003, 81 (2-3) : 193 - 199