Comparing biomechanical strength of unicortical locking plate versus bicortical compression plate for transverse midshaft metacarpal fracture

被引:2
|
作者
Shanmugam, Rukmanikanthan [1 ]
Jian, Chong Yin Chyi Chong Shyh [1 ]
Haseeb, Amber [1 ]
Aik, Saw [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg NOCERAL, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
来源
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY | 2018年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
compression plate; locking plate; metacarpal fracture; unicortical locking plate; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; PHALANGEAL; HAND; SCREWS;
D O I
10.1177/2309499018802511
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Metacarpal bone fractures constitute 10% of all fractures. Unstable metacarpal fractures require surgical intervention, which poses danger to flexor tendon either due to bicortical drilling or construct of the implant. Unicortical locking plate fixation may be the solution to preventing flexor tendon injury. Studies have compared locking and compression plates. However, in these studies, the biomechanical properties were tested using the static loading method. This study looks into cyclical loading that is more representative of in vivo conditions, particularly for early rehabilitation. We compared the biomechanical strength of the unicortical locking plate and bicortical compression plate system in a transverse metacarpal fracture, tested with cyclical loading and torsion. Method: Twenty pieces of fourth-generation, biomechanical testing grade, left third metacarpal composite bones were used. Resin was used to create the holding block at both ends of the bone. An oscillating saw with 0.8 mm thick saw blade was used to osteotomize the metacarpal sawbones to create a midshaft transverse metacarpal fracture model. Ten pieces were fixed with a 2.0 mm titanium locking plate via unicortical screw purchase and 10 were fixed with a 2.0 mm, four holes, titanium dynamic compression plate, bicortical purchase of screws. They were subjected to cyclic load to failure testing three-point bending and torsion. Results: There were no significant difference in stiffness and cyclic three-point bending to failure between the unicortical locking plate group and the bicortical compression plate group. The bicortical compression plate group is stiffer and has a higher cyclic bending load to failure as compared to the unicortical locking plate group. Conclusion: Unicortical locking plate fixation of metacarpal fracture can be reliably applied clinically to produce a strong and stable construct that allows early mobilization of the joints. This will not only reduce the complication rate of metacarpal plating, but also improve the functional outcome of the hand.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical comparison of the Locking Compression superior anterior clavicle plate with seven and ten hole reconstruction plates in midshaft clavicle fracture stabilisation
    Lars Eden
    Stefanie Doht
    Sönke P. Frey
    Dirk Ziegler
    Jan Stoyhe
    Kai Fehske
    Torsten Blunk
    Rainer H. Meffert
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 2537 - 2543
  • [22] A Biomechanical Comparison of Locked Unicortical with Non-Locking Bicortical Screws for Metacarpal Shaft Fractures in a Randomized Human Cadaveric Model
    Minogue, Febe
    Reilly, Keryn
    Walker, Cameron
    Malak, Sharif
    Mayo, Andrew
    Heiss-Dunlop, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, 2021, 26 (01): : 10 - 16
  • [23] Posterior buttress plate with locking compression plate for Hoffa fracture
    Tetsunaga, Tomonori
    Sato, Toru
    Shiota, Naofumi
    Yoshida, Masahiro
    Mochizuki, Yusuke
    Tetsunaga, Tomoko
    Teramoto, Arubi
    Okazaki, Yoshiki
    Yamada, Kazuki
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (05) : 798 - 802
  • [24] In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contact dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate
    Aguila, AZ
    Manos, JM
    Orlansky, AS
    Todhunter, RJ
    Trotter, EJ
    van der Meulen, MCH
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2005, 18 (04) : 220 - 226
  • [25] Biomechanical Analysis of Locking Reconstruction Plate Using Mono- or Bicortical Screws
    Santos, Rogerio Rodrigues
    Rahal, Sheila Canevese
    Neto, Camilo Mesquita
    Ribeiro, Celso Roberto
    Capello Sousa, Edson Antonio
    Foschini, Cesar Renato
    Agostinho, Felipe Stefan
    Mesquita, Luciane dos Reis
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2016, 19 (03): : 588 - 593
  • [26] Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: Locking plate versus K-wire?
    Facca, S.
    Ramdhian, R.
    Pelissier, A.
    Diaconu, M.
    Liverneaux, P.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (05) : 506 - 512
  • [27] Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: A cadaveric model
    Dougherty, Paul J.
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    Meisterling, Steve
    Wybo, Christopher
    Yeni, Yener
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (06) : 399 - 403
  • [28] In vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones
    Sod, Gary A.
    Mitchell, Colin F.
    Hubert, Jeremy D.
    Martin, George S.
    Gill, Marjorie S.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2008, 37 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [29] Biomechanical study of olecranon plate fixation in comminuted osteoporotic fracture model: locking compression plates versus dynamic compression plates
    Shakir, Irshad
    Israel, Heidi
    Cannada, Lisa K.
    Bledsoe, Gary
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2018, 29 (02): : 167 - 172
  • [30] Biomechanical Comparison of a Notched Head Locking T-Plate and a Straight Locking Compression Plate in a Juxta-Articular Fracture Model
    Bird, Guy
    Glyde, Mark
    Hosgood, Giselle
    Hayes, Alex
    Day, Robert
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 34 (03) : 161 - 170