Reading aloud from logographic and alphabetic texts: Comparisons between Chinese and German

The following study investigated the effect of writting systems (logographic vs. alphabetic) on the following study investigated the effect of writing systems (logographic vs, alphabetic) on the temporal organization of reading aloud. More specifically, we wished to test Perfetti and Zhang's (1995) assertion that "the reader of an alphabetic system can do better at recovering the phonological form, less well at recovering the semantic category of the word" (p. 186f). Native speakers of Chinese and German read a semantically identical passage from texts written in their own language. The Chinese version consisted of 132 characters (132 syllables), the German of 80 words (also 132 syllables). In accord with Perfetti and Zhang's position, Chinese readers articulated significantly more slowly they also used significantly more pauses. Moreover, German renders used a set pattern of pause positions, whereas Chinese did not. Logographic and alphabetic determinants of reading aloud are discussed.